Attendees

• Nat Sakimura
• Mark Haine
• Taylor Ongaro
• Kosuke Koiwai
• Daniel Fett
• Dima Postnikov
• Joseph Heenan
• Torsten Lodderstedt
• Anthony Nadalin
• Sascha Preibisch
• Julian White
• Stephane Mouy
• Maralm
• Naohiro Fujie

Agenda

• Brief review of external Orgs & Event
• Agenda items
• PRs & Issues

Brief review of external Orgs & Event

• Cross Sector Digital Identity Forum in UK
  • Mark, Torsten attended

Agenda Items

• Are we close to Implementers draft 3?
  • 5 issues on “Implementers Draft 3” milestone
  • 2 have active PRs
    • Address_iso_code - PR #67 / Issue #1239 – Torsten
      • need for something in the IANA considerations section in relation to this change. The current JWT claims registry entry for address references the ab working group at present and this tweak would not be referenced in any way.
    • Id_evidence - PR #63 / Issue #1225 - Julian
      • Julian and Torsten chat on Monday
      • Need for review
    • Leaving Issue #1232 – Owner of claims
      • Jules proposed to have method of id_docucment in verification element
      • This issue will fix verification / validation confusion in the spec.
    • Kick the process to proceed to the implementers draft 3 voting
      • Make consensus on the mailing list
      • Ask OpenID Foundation Secretary, Mike Jones, to start 45 days review period

PRs & Issues

Review PRs

• Match/unavailability metadata – PR #56 - Daniel
• Abort/omit PR #52 – Daniel
  • No new feedbacks at this momement
• Age verification - Daniel
  • The next step is write a new PR alterative to the existing one.

Other Issues

• PCTF trusted process – Issue #1227 – Ben/Julian
  • Will have offline meeting
• Userinfo required? - Issue #1240 - Mark
• ID_Token required - Issue #1241 - Mark
  • Question from UK bank
  • Is it required to support verified claims both in id_token and userinfo?
  • Basically both optional and either one are mandatory
  • How to present whether the verified claims in id_token or userinfo in discovery document
  • The discovery sort of things are suitable to discuss in core wg. But to things get faster, write change in eKYC spec first.
• Issue #1236, #1237
  • Naohiro will have discussion with METI about Mark's comments, but no need to wait for the discussion to update PR.
• Pending verification Issue #1233
  • Some mechanism to notify the status of identity assurance process from OP to RP such as webhook/polling for this use-case
  • Sascha will read the issue and add comment.
• Quick updates on FAQ/Roadmap - Mark
  • Close to a reasonable draft.