Wiki

Clone wiki

ekyc-ida / Minutes / eKYC-IDA_Meeting_Notes_2021-05-05

Attendees

  • Mark Haine
  • Torsten Lodderstedt
  • Joseph Heenan
  • Julian White
  • Bjorn Hjelm
  • Daniel Fett
  • Kosuke Koiwai
  • Dima Postnikov
  • Anthony Nadalin
  • Kai Lehmann
  • Brian Campbell
  • Peter Bainbridge
  • Naohiro Fujie

Brief review of external Orgs & Event

  • OIDF Virtual Workshop - Thursday
    • The biggest topic was that Gail Hodges is now the new Executive Directory of OpenID Foundation.

PRs & Issues

  • Implementers draft 3 focus
    • PR #67 – country code - Torsten
      • Kai has reviewed and Torsten fixed typo, resolved the conflict.
      • Mark will review and approve after he login to the bitbucket.
    • PR #70 – relaxation of purpose – Torsten
      • Merged
    • PR #63 / Issue #1225 - Id_evidence - Julian
      • It is depend on trust framework whether evidence->id_document or evidence->other was used.
    • PR #68 – Clarify handling of unavailable/non-matching data –Daniel
      • Daniel fixed the PR align to the review/comments by Kai and Sascha.
    • Issue #1232 –– Owner of claims - Julian
      • Torsten will check the impact on current implementations

Review PRs

  • Restricted_id - PR #59 – Kai
    • Kai added document_identifier
    • No objection to merge

Other issues that we may cover

  • OpenID Core gap around “claims_responses_supported” – Issue #1240
    • Mark raised an issue on AB/Connect WG.
    • Mark and Tony will attend the WG tomorrow.
    • Close this issue at eKYC WG.
  • Sender Constraining attachment access token – Issue #1231 – Joseph
    • Torsten commented that it is important to use sender constraint access token if the OP use distributed claim because it should be used the same mechanism between RP/OPs.
    • Continue to discuss in the WG calls
  • Value constraints on claims - Issue #1247 – Daniel
    • Daniel proposed to forbid value/values constraints on verified_claims/claims
  • eIDAS SAML assertion mapping - Issue #1246 - Torsten
    • Need to discuss whether the claim mapping is responsibility of trust framework space or protocol space.
    • Mark, Brian will have debate on this topic with Peter.
  • Metadata for claims languages Issue – Issue #1157 – Nat
    • Will be closed.
  • RFC Links - Issue #1216 - Kai
    • Will be closed.

Updated