Attendees

• Mark Haine
• Torsten Lodderstedt
• Bjorn Hjelm
• Kosuke Koiwai
• Joseph Heenan
• Takahiko Kawasaki
• Dima Postnikov
• Julian White
• Sascha Preibisch
• Daniel Fett
• Brian Campbell
• Kai Lehmann
• Ralph Bragg
• Danillo Branco
• Peter Bainbridge-Clayton
• Naohiro Fujie

Brief review of external Orgs & Event

• Nick Mothershow has presented at the TISA meeting

Agenda Items

• EIC Awards Submission
  • Don, Mike Jones, Mike L will supports
  • Torsten will do, too.
• Mark emailed to Gail to join the next week's call.

PRs & Issues

• Implementers draft 3 focus
  • PR #63 / Issue #1225 - Id_evidence - Julian
  • PR #68 – Clarify handling of unavailable/non-matching data –Daniel
    • Kai and Sascha reviewed and approved
  • Issue #1232 –– Owner of claims - Julian
  • Issue #1242 - Look ahead for distributed/aggregated – Torsten/Peter
    • Peter already cloned the repository and created a branch.
    • He will create PR after resolve the issue on accessing to the bitbucket.

Review PRs

• Daniel will close following PRs to hand over them to new PRs, #71, #72.
  • PR #56 - transferring match/unavailability metadata
  • PR #42 – age verification
• PR #71 – Transformed Claims - Update and next steps - Daniel
  • This topic would be discussed as separate spec, but it would be ok to merge to the current IDA spec as it is.
  • No objection at this moment to merge the PR.
• PR #72 – Select Abort/Omit - Update and next steps - Daniel
  • No objection at this moment to merge the PR.

Other Issues that we may cover

• Match by hashed value – Issue #1218 – Kosuke – Does PR#71 cover this?
  • Kosuke agreed that the transform claims spec can address this issue.
• pre-configured claims – Issue #1245 - Torsten
  • Not actively discussing on this issue now.
• SAML assertion mapping - Issue #1246 - Torsten
  • Torsten and Peter discussed on this topic.
  • Torsten's opinion is by creating wiki page to describe the mappings of attributes between eIDAS.
• Value contraints on claims - Issue #1247 – Daniel
  • Daniel will raise a PR for this
• Sender Constraining attachment access token – Issue #1231 – Joseph
  • Torten, Daniel, Joseph discussed on this topic and came to conclusion to add a field to indicate the access token is sender constraint.
  • Sascha will review
• Conformance test - Joseph
  • Joseph continue to think about this.