Wiki
Clone wikiekyc-ida / Minutes / eKYC-IDA_Meeting_Notes_2021-07-21
Attendees
- Nat Sakimura
- Mark Haine
- Bjorn Hjelm
- Anthony Nadalin
- Dima Postnikov
- Serkan Ozkan
- Kosuke Koiwai
- Joseph Heenan
- Julian Whilte
- Sascha Preibisch
- David Chadwick
- Naohiro Fujie
Brief review of external Orgs & Events
- OIDF Workshop F2F 30th Sept at EIC in Munich
- eKYC panel at APEC workshop - Mark will join
Main Agenda Items
- Conformance
- Serkan, one of the core member of conformance test team at OIDF, joins this meeting to develop a conformance test for OIDC4IDA.
- Mark shared with Serkan a google doc which Joseph and Daniel wrote for conformance test.
- Next steps prioritization
- Proposed items
- Interoperability/Collaborations
- Final OpenID 4 IDA spec
- Conformance
- OpenID for Authority
- Advanced Syntax for Claims
- Pending verification
- Predefined Claims and Values
- How to prioritize these topics
- Poll on the mailing list
- Having a co-chair meeting
- F2F discussion
- Anyway consensus process would be required
- Nat proposed it is usual to have interoperability event before proceed to finalize the spec
- Julian proposed categorize trust framework such as NIST/TISA, etc.
- Mark said it will be covered in predefined claims and values.
- Proposed items
PRs & Issues
- PR #75 / Issue
#1242- Look ahead for distributed/aggregated – Peter- Mark commented on response example
- Mark will ask Peter about his comment and approve the PR
- PR #77 / Issue
#1249- OP Metadata –– Mark- Julian approved
- David asked about what happened if OP does not support id documents which RP requires in "documents_supported" or "evidence_supported" element in metadata.
- PR #78 - Make evidence types and examples from PR #63 consistent with PR #74 - Julian
- Julian will work on this PR by the next week
- Mark will discuss with Torsten and proceed to the formal process of moving forward to the implementer's draft 3.
- Nat mentioned that it is required to post to the mailing list to proceed.
Review PRs
Other Issues that we may cover
- Mark joined the OpenID Connect A/B Connect WG's previous call to discuss requirement for OP metadata to express supported/not-supported the claims parameter by the OP.
- Nat said that it would be one option that define OP metadata requirement on the IDA spec.
- Nat mentioned that there are several COVID19 vaccine passport specs using verifiable credentials and OIDC4IDA would be an option.
- David mentioned that OIDC-SIOP will be an option for the vaccine certificate because of its privacy requirement is fit with the spec.
- The second option would be OIDC4IDA
- Nat wanted to know who appetite to have discussion on this topic
- David, Sascha, Mark have an interest on this topic
Updated