FAPI 2.0: Use ISO requirements conventions instead of IETF
Issue #280
resolved
“MUST” should be “shall” etc.
Comments (3)
-
reporter -
reporter -
assigned issue to
-
assigned issue to
-
- changed status to resolved
Fix
#280: Use ISO language instead of IETF→ <<cset bd7bb6d65466>>
- Log in to comment
@Nat Sakimura Are there no RFCs (using IETF’s conventions) that have become ISO standards?