-
assigned issue to
"In addition, the confidential client for write operations" causes confusion
Issue #299
resolved
The text In addition, the confidential client for write operations
is causing confusion in Australia / UK where I understand they're adopted FAPI-RW for read operations.
I think we should probably move any mention of write operations to some non-normative text, perhaps mention something like “some servers may apply the weaker restrictions in FAPI-R if they detect a read-only operation” (although I think even that text might potentially still cause the same confusion).
I’d suggest just removing “for write operations” here.
Comments (7)
-
-
-
- changed status to open
-
- changed status to resolved
PR merged
-
- changed component to Part 2: Advanced
-
- changed component to FAPI 1 – Part 2: Advanced
-
- changed component to FAPI 1: Advanced
- Log in to comment