- changed status to open
DPoP reference needs to be updated to the RFC
Issue #626
resolved
DPoP is now https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9449 so FAPI2SP should reference the RFC rather than the draft.
Comments (5)
-
-
-
assigned issue to
-
assigned issue to
-
-
reporter I don’t think FAPI1 currently references DPoP so I’d say no?
-
- changed status to resolved
PR merged
- Log in to comment