views isn't being analysed by codacy as it is over 150 k

[Ed McDonagh]

Analysing it will drag down the score, as it is terrible. But there is no satisfaction in making it better if Codacy doesn’t see that you have touched it!

[Ed McDonagh]

See https://support.codacy.com/hc/en-us/articles/360025964333

[Ed McDonagh]

Factored out Size related views to import views. Only down to 193K from 203K. Refs #744, #826

→ <<cset 7e1423c9a35e>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Another 4K down by moving DICOM related views to dicomviews.py. Refs #744, #826

→ <<cset afd4a25be1ac>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Cut views in half with new views_admin.py. New branch to test it. Refs #744, #826

→ <<cset 796e4793fce7>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Update reference to _create_admin_dict. Refs #744, #826

→ <<cset 3f886afb901a>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Update reference in tests to reset_dual. Refs #744, #826

→ <<cset aa3314ddf129>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Fixing hard coded URLs brought to life by ref #826.

→ <<cset b749e7b9d1c1>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Fixed mistake in last commit, refs #826.

→ <<cset 93732d66646e>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Added ref #826 to changes in preparation for PR

→ <<cset adb95f9bba8b>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Merged in issue826reduceViewsSize (pull request #364)

Fixes #826 Refs #744

→ <<cset ca124795bace>>