Box falling through belt

Issue #115 resolved
Joey Gannon created an issue

Since the upgrade to Gazebo 8.4, I've been seeing issues with the box spontaneously falling through the conveyor belt. It's not common, maybe one in fifteen runs, but it has happened multiple times. Is it safe to assume that if this happens during the qualification trial, we'll get a second chance?

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPOgYkgBDYM

Comments (14)

  1. Deanna Hood

    Thanks for the report. Have you ever seen this happen while the simulation is running, or only ever in log playback?

  2. Joey Gannon reporter

    I haven't actually seen it live because of how infrequently it happens, but it is consistent with behavior reported in my text logs. Not long after this, I start the belt running at full power, and I can tell from other sensors that the box is not moving with it.

  3. Deanna Hood

    Ok, thanks. There are some artefacts that get introduced with log playback (boxes falling slowly) but this sounds more like a simulation bug than a playback artefact. I'll take a closer looks and get back to you with an answer to your question tomorrow.

  4. Deanna Hood

    Thank you for the additional clip; if there's anything in particular that you find makes it more likely to happen that will help us look into it faster.

    In the context of qual1 I can confirm that if this occurs during an automated trial run of a participant's system it will warrant a rerun.

  5. Deanna Hood

    @joeygannon I think this was caused by "bad luck" on the physics side of the simulation. The shipping box model has been altered in https://bitbucket.org/osrf/ariac/pull-requests/94/ to hopefully make this less likely to occur. I haven't been able to reproduce the issue even with the original shipping box model, so it is difficult to be certain that this has been fixed, but I am going to close this issue optimistically and we can reopen it if you/others still encounter it.

  6. Joey Gannon reporter

    Any idea when the new version will go into the dockerhub image? Looks like it's still stuck on 2.1.6.

  7. Joey Gannon reporter

    I've run enough tests now to feel confident that this is fixed. Thank you for your diligence on this issue!

  8. Log in to comment