4d, 5d, 6d DMDA

Issue #191 new
BarryFSmith
created an issue

Probably with more limited capabilities.

Needed by SciDAC Fusion disruption runaway electron models.

Comments (5)

  1. BarryFSmith reporter

    Yes, parallel distribution in all six dimensions. Currently we only support equivalent stencils.

    It is a question. Would it be more tractable if we didn't implement everything the DMDA 1,2,3 implement?

  2. Jed Brown

    Depends what you leave out. A lot of DMDA could be refactored to be dimension-independent, likely with less code, but it would be tedious to confirm that all the corner cases are handled correctly.

  3. Log in to comment