I just learned of scm-manager and was under the impression it was something of a Bitbucket alternative. Clicking around your site to learn more I was absolutely stunned to see that in order to read the latest release notes I would need to go look at the scm-manager code on Bitbucket. Why isn't scm-manager code managed by an scm-manager instance? Perhaps there's a good reason, but it gives a new arrival such as myself the impression that you don't trust the code enough to use it yourself, so it makes me uneasy about even considering relying on it. There's a phrase for this: eat your own dog food. Something to consider, anyway.
Issue #577 invalid