Shlomi Fish committed 11dbc7e

Add the #xkcd sex talk fortune

  • Participants
  • Parent commits 2c27980

Comments (0)

Files changed (3)

File t2/humour/fortunes/fortunes-shlomif-ids-data.yaml

       date: 2011-04-01T16:29:50Z
       date: 2011-02-22T09:53:12Z
+    sharp-xkcd-programming-languages-sex-talk:
+      date: 2014-07-03T03:34:06Z
       date: 2008-07-04T09:17:00Z

File t2/humour/fortunes/shlomif.xml

+    <fortune id="sharp-xkcd-programming-languages-sex-talk">
+        <meta>
+            <title>#xkcd: Programming Languages’s Sex Talk</title>
+        </meta>
+        <irc>
+            <body>
+<saying who="rindolf">Bucket: FAILURE IS ALWAYS AN OPTION.</saying>
+<saying who="Bucket">rindolf: I already had it that way</saying>
+<saying who="ephphatha">time to kick aliens into orbit</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">It&#39;s not a failure, it&#39;s a motivation to improve.</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">rindolf: failure is always an option except when your goal is to fail</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">&lt;/fortune-cookie&gt;</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">rindolf: except in bed</saying>
+<saying who="Bucket">I get great sex, except in bed.</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">njsg: heh.</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">njsg: in bed? Do you mean I make mistakes while sleeping?</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">njsg: &quot;What is your favourite position? CTO!&quot;</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">Failures in bed mean you have sex that isn&#39;t type-safe; otherwise you&#39;d catched the errors at compile time</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Walther: heh, LOL.</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">also, Haskell&lt;3</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">I have a lipht, my sex has no separate compile time</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">bwhaha</saying>
+<me_is who="Walther">has changed the topic to: It&#39;s programming language + sex hour at #xkcd! | SCOTUS says [corporate] religious freedom trumps equal benefits for women in 5-4 ruling, FML | Weekly Coffee Appreciation Day | It&#39;s put The0x539 in bucket hour! | mint hour | (association football) | knockout talk time | Ch</me_is>
+<saying who="njsg">wasn&#39;t there an UI toolkit called &quot;sex&quot;?</saying>
+<saying who="Fephisto">sex-purity</saying>
+<saying who="SirCmpwn">I once wrote an assembler called .orgASM</saying>
+<saying who="SirCmpwn">(.org is an assembler directive)</saying>
+<saying who="bhuddah">maybe we should invent the scripting language &quot;innuendo&quot;</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Walther: Haskell Sex!</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Walther: - see also this on #perlcafe many years ago.</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">bhuddah: for inno setup, sounds like a good name</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">rindolf: wonder if that can be pure, or just an IO action</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">(if you know what i mean)</saying>
+<saying who="tomatosalad">SirCmpwn: rcombs is always talking about libass</saying>
+<saying who="bhuddah">njsg: and you get exactly what you asked for.</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">Haskell Sex is great, but you don&#39;t remember any of it on the next morning, because it has no state</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Walther: with Lady_Aleena who became Mistress_Aleena and Madame_Aleena.</saying>
+<saying who="SirCmpwn">tomatosalad: well, yeah</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">njsg: heh, LOL.</saying>
+<saying who="SirCmpwn">he&#39;s an irrational wizard</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">njsg: you crack me up.</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">njsg: maybe we need something like Smalltalk sex with a persistent VM.</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Squeak FTW!</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">lisp, as one of the only languages which can truly return multiple values, is the only way to have true multiple orgasms as a result of sex</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Heh, someone I know will get the kick out of this conversation.</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">rindolf: :&#39;D</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Geek pseudo sex-talk.</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">Stateless sex could be a bit difficult to reach though, as it&#39;d require a REST api, and you just might fall asleep</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">njsg: heh.</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Walther: heh.</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Walther++</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">OTOH clean, stateful sex should be easy, with SOAP</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Walther: SOAP! NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</saying>
+<me_is who="Walther">puts stateful sex with a SOAP in Bucket</me_is>
+<me_is who="Bucket">hands Walther another serving of rat oh vah in exchange for stateful sex with a SOAP</me_is>
+<saying who="rindolf">Walther: /me runs away in the opposite direction. No amount of sex is worth having to deal with SOAP.</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">There are some things even I won&#39;t do for sex.</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">rindolf: just have sex over TCP, looks like a good protocol</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">And SOAP is one of them.</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">crushes are UDP, love is TCP, sex is SOAP over HTTP</saying>
+<saying who="Walther">and then there&#39;s the weird kid with the gopher</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">Well, I refuse to get paid to write Java enterprise software - .</saying>
+<saying who="rindolf">njsg: heh.</saying>
+<saying who="njsg">at least nobody mentioned COBRA yet, others would go all OMG</saying>
+            </body>
+            <info>
+                <channel>xkcd</channel>
+                <network></network>
+            </info>
+        </irc>
+    </fortune>

File t2/humour/fortunes/ver.txt