Commits

shl...@iglu.org.il@cec68495-dca5-4e2b-845c-11fdaaa4f967  committed b757a5f

Convert more ASCII single/double quotes to Unicode

  • Participants
  • Parent commits c208a1d

Comments (0)

Files changed (5)

File t2/open-source/anti/autohell/index.html.wml

 <li>
 <p>
 The CMake files are written in a consistent high-level language, whose 
-interpreter is written in C++. This is instead of Autoconf's 
+interpreter is written in C++. This is instead of Autoconfs 
 m4-generating-Bourne-shell setup, where both m4 and /bin/sh are quirky and 
 get broken very easily.
 </p>
 
 <li>
 <p>
-Compilation is much faster with CMake because it doesn’t use GNU's thousands'
+Compilation is much faster with CMake because it doesn’t use GNUs thousands
 lines long libtool shell script, which incurs a lot of overhead. 
 </p>
 </li>
 <p>
 CMake uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses#3-clause_license_.28.22New_BSD_License.22.29">the 
 modified BSD license</a> (which is GPL-compatible and allows virtually any
-use), instead of GNU Autotools' GNU General Public License (GPL) which is
+use), instead of GNU Autotools GNU General Public License (GPL) which is
 much more restrictive.
 </p>
 </li>
 <a href="http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake">a helpful wiki</a>, and web
 searches can also prove of help. It also has a mailing list and an IRC
 channel where one can get help. I find it much better than Autoconf and
-friend's documentation, which tends to be incomplete, verbose, split
+friends documentation, which tends to be incomplete, verbose, split
 and confusing.
 </p>
 
 </p>
 
 <h3 id="not-standard">CMake Does Not Use a Standard Syntax as Opposed to 
-Autoconf's sh+m4</h3>
+Autoconfs sh+m4</h3>
 
 <p>
-While Bourne Shell ("sh") and m4 have POSIX standards behind them, they are 
-very awful and vile. Moreover, Autoconf mandates on using GNU m4, which isn't
+While Bourne Shell (“sh”) and m4 have POSIX standards behind them, they are 
+very awful and vile. Moreover, Autoconf mandates on using GNU m4, which isn’t
 standard. Writing Autoconf macros or customising the Autoconf code is
 hard and the results tend to be very easy to break. 
 </p>
 
 <p>
 CMake, on the other hand uses a custom syntax, which is consistent, 
-trustworthy, predictable and reliable. The fact that it isn't "standard" does 
+trustworthy, predictable and reliable. The fact that it isnt standard does 
 not make it bad.
 </p>
 
 <ul>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://lucidfox.org/posts/view/556">"Dear GNU Autohell…"</a> - on
-<a href="http://lucidfox.org/">Maia's Eclectic Ministry of Introspection</a>.
+<a href="http://lucidfox.org/posts/view/556">“Dear GNU Autohell…”</a> - on
+<a href="http://lucidfox.org/">Maia’s Eclectic Ministry of Introspection</a>.
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/889/">Freshmeat Editorial - "Stop
-the Autoconf Insanity"</a>.
+<a href="http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/889/">Freshmeat Editorial - “Stop
+the Autoconf Insanity”</a>.
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/188693/">"Why the KDE project switched to
-CMake - and how"</a> (on LWN.net).
+<a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/188693/">“Why the KDE project switched to
+CMake - and how”</a> (on LWN.net).
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ut9o4OdSC0">Google Tech Talk:
-"CMake/CPack/CTest/CDash Open Source Tools to Build Test and Deploy C++
-Software"</a>
+“CMake/CPack/CTest/CDash Open Source Tools to Build Test and Deploy C++
+Software”</a>
 </li>
 
 </ul>

File t2/open-source/anti/csh/index.html.wml

 <p>
 Tom Christiansen (of Perl fame) wrote 
 <a href="http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/">Csh 
-Considered Harmful</a>, which gives many good arguments for csh's
+Considered Harmful</a>, which gives many good arguments for cshs
 inadequacy as a shell scripting language. 
-<a href="http://www.grymoire.com/Unix/CshTop10.txt">Bruce Barnett's 
-"Top Ten Reasons not to use the C shell"</a> gives more convincing arguments,
+<a href="http://www.grymoire.com/Unix/CshTop10.txt">Bruce Barnett’s 
+“Top Ten Reasons not to use the C shell”</a> gives more convincing arguments,
 and illustrates how awful csh is.
 </p>
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <p>
-The students tend to conclude that C-shell is "The UNIX Shell". Seeing how
+The students tend to conclude that C-shell is The UNIX Shell. Seeing how
 lame C-shell is they tend to believe that the UNIX shell sucks. Which is not
 the case for Bash and friends which are beautiful and a joy to work with.
 </p>
 
 <p>
 For this generation the choice is clear: bash or zsh that combine both good
-programmability and good interactive use. There's no reason to keep using
+programmability and good interactive use. Theres no reason to keep using
 tcsh forever.
 </p>
 
 </ol>
 
 <p>
-There's also <a href="http://www.kornshell.com/">The Korn Shell</a> which
+Theres also <a href="http://www.kornshell.com/">The Korn Shell</a> which
 has lately been open-sourced, but I have never really tried it. It should
 be a very decent shell, though.
 </p>

File t2/open-source/anti/index.html.wml

 
 <h3><a href="mysql/">Against MySQL</a></h3>
 
-<h3><a href="php/">"PHP Sucks" - originally by czth.net</a></h3>
+<h3><a href="php/">PHP Sucks - originally by czth.net</a></h3>
 
 <h3><a href="autohell/">Escape from GNU Autohell! (GNU Autotools)</a></h3>
 

File t2/open-source/anti/javascript/index.html.wml

 #include '../template.wml'
-<latemp_subject "Don't Abuse JavaScript!" />
+<latemp_subject "Dont Abuse JavaScript!" />
 
 <p>
 <b>Last Updated:</b> 28-January-2010
 <h3 id="line-break">Line breaks terminate expressions</h3>
 
 <p>
-Line breaks (in addition to ";") terminate expressions. This can cause
+Line breaks (in addition to “;”) terminate expressions. This can cause
 many subtle errors.
 </p>
 
 <h3 id="closures">Starting a closure is not convenient</h3>
 
 <p>
-One needs to type "(function () { function() { ... } })" to start a closure.
+One needs to type (function () { function() { ... } }) to start a closure.
 </p>
 
 <h3 id="foreach">Foreach Loop</h3>
 
 <p>
-JavaScript's foreach loop loops on the indices of the list 
+JavaScripts foreach loop loops on the indices of the list 
 instead of its values.
 </p>
 
 
 <ul>
 <li>
-<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQVTIJBZook">"JavaScript: The Good 
-Parts" Tech Talk</a> - should be called "JavaScript: The Bad Parts".
+<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQVTIJBZook"> “JavaScript: The Good Parts” Tech Talk</a> - 
+should be called “JavaScript: The Bad Parts”.
 </li>
 <li>
-<a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/2008/04/popularity.html">"Popularity"</a> (via 
-<a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2008/04/a_short_history_of_the_develop.html">chromatic's 
-"A Short History of the Development of JavaScript"</a>):<br />
+<a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/2008/04/popularity.html">“Popularity”</a> (via 
+<a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2008/04/a_short_history_of_the_develop.html">chromatic’s 
+“A Short History of the Development of JavaScript”</a>):<br />
 <ul>
 <li>
 <blockquote>
 <blockquote>
 <p>
 Ok, back to JavaScript popularity. We know certain Ajax libraries are popular.
-Is JavaScript popular? It's hard to say. Some Ajax developers profess (and
+Is JavaScript popular? Its hard to say. Some Ajax developers profess (and
 demonstrate) love for it. Yet many curse it, including me. I still think of it
-as a quickie love-child of C and Self. Dr. Johnson's words come to mind: "the
-part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good."
+as a quickie love-child of C and Self. Dr. Johnson’s words come to mind: 
+“the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not
+good.”
 </p>
 </blockquote>
 </li>
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yDS1eGfuWQ">"Upcoming Changes to the 
-JavaScript Language"</a> - about ECMAScript 4.0, while detailing many
+<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yDS1eGfuWQ">
+“Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language”</a> - about ECMAScript 4.0, while detailing many
 of the current shortcomings of JavaScript.
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://blogs.perl.org/users/jhannah_mutation_grid/2010/11/javascript-scoping-perls.html">Jay @ Mutation Grid: 
-"JavaScript's scoping != Perl's"</a> (4-November-2010) 
+JavaScripts scoping != Perl’s”</a> (4-November-2010) 
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://www.jwz.org/blog/2010/10/every-day-i-learn-something-new-and-stupid/">jwz: "Everyday I learn something new… and stupid"</a> - about JavaScript's
+<a href="http://www.jwz.org/blog/2010/10/every-day-i-learn-something-new-and-stupid/">jwz: 
+“Everyday I learn something new… and stupid”</a> - about JavaScript’s
 numbers and integers.
 </li>
 

File t2/open-source/anti/mysql/index.html.wml

 
 <li>
 <a href="http://use.perl.org/~merlyn/journal/11202">Randal Schwartz -
-"PostgreSQL and MySQL - better explained"</a>
+PostgreSQL and MySQL - better explained</a>
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://use.perl.org/~merlyn/journal/30002">Randal Schwartz - 
-"Misquoting JWZ about databases"</a> - also see the commentary.
+Misquoting JWZ about databases</a> - also see the commentary.
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://www.andrewsavory.com/blog/archives/000266.html">MySQL sucks</a>
 </li>
 <li>
-<a href="http://www.andrewsavory.com/blog/archives/000559.html">"MySQL makes
-me sick"</a>
+<a href="http://www.andrewsavory.com/blog/archives/000559.html">“MySQL makes
+me sick”</a>
 </li>
 <li>
 <a href="http://www.andrewsavory.com/blog/archives/000942.html">MySQL is a 
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://idkn.blogli.co.il/archives/209">Ido Kanner - "The Cry of the 
-Dolphins"</a> - about incompatibility between the various MySQL storage backends.
+<a href="http://idkn.blogli.co.il/archives/209">Ido Kanner - “The Cry of the 
+Dolphins”</a> - about incompatibility between the various MySQL storage backends.
 </li>
 
 <li>
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://digg.com/programming/Sometimes_MySQL_Sucks_So_Much_that_You_Need_PostgreSQL">"Sometimes MySQL Sucks so much that You Need PostgreSQL"</a>
+<a href="http://digg.com/programming/Sometimes_MySQL_Sucks_So_Much_that_You_Need_PostgreSQL">“Sometimes MySQL Sucks so much that You Need PostgreSQL”</a>
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://drbrain.livejournal.com/61705.html">drbrian: MySQL Sucks</a>
-- some "lovely gems from the MySQL reference manual".
+- some lovely gems from the MySQL reference manual.
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/23/1234203">"Slashdot: 
-Slimmed Down MySQL Offshoot Drizzle is Built for the Web"</a> - the 
+<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/23/1234203">“Slashdot: 
+Slimmed Down MySQL Offshoot Drizzle is Built for the Web”</a> - the 
 thread contains many insightful comments.
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/37398">"Pulling the MySQL Triggers"
+<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/37398">Pulling the MySQL Triggers
 by Ovid</a>.
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://art-blog.no-ip.info/newpress/blog/post/174">"An Unpleasant
-Surprise from MySQL" by Artyom Tonkikh</a> (in Hebrew) (19-September-2008)
+<a href="http://art-blog.no-ip.info/newpress/blog/post/174">“An Unpleasant
+Surprise from MySQL” by Artyom Tonkikh</a> (in Hebrew) (19-September-2008)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/08/2230221">"David
-Axmark Resigns From Sun"</a> (08-October-2008)
+<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/08/2230221">“David
+Axmark Resigns From Sun”</a> (08-October-2008)
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <ul>
 <li>
 <a href="http://idkn.wordpress.com/2008/10/16/mysql-vs-postgresql/">Coverage
-on Ido Kanner's blog</a> (in Hebrew).
+on Ido Kanners blog</a> (in Hebrew).
 </li>
 </ul>
 </li>
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/37817">Ovid - "Tests I should
-Not Have to Write (for MySQL)"</a>
+<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/37817">Ovid - “Tests I should
+Not Have to Write (for MySQL)”</a>
 </li>
 
 <li>
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/01/1627257">"MySQL
-5.1 Released, Not Quite Up To Par"</a> (01-December-2008)
+<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/01/1627257">“MySQL
+5.1 Released, Not Quite Up To Par”</a> (01-December-2008)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="https://fossbazaar.org/content/josh-berkus-two-great-open-source-databases-comparison-2008-06-26">"Josh Berkus: Two Great Open Source Databases Comparison"</a>
+<a href="https://fossbazaar.org/content/josh-berkus-two-great-open-source-databases-comparison-2008-06-26">“Josh Berkus: Two Great Open Source Databases Comparison”</a>
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/309243/">"MySQL 5.1 and Development 
-Models"</a> (03-December-2008)
+<a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/309243/">“MySQL 5.1 and Development 
+Models”</a> (03-December-2008)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://use.perl.org/~jdavidb/journal/38019">"What do you think
-about case-sensitive databases?"</a> - by jdavidb on use.perl.org 
+<a href="http://use.perl.org/~jdavidb/journal/38019">“What do you think
+about case-sensitive databases?”</a> - by jdavidb on use.perl.org 
 (04-December-2008)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/38546">"Today's
-Database Nightmare"</a> by Ovid on use.perl.org (24-February-2009)
+<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/38546">“Today’s
+Database Nightmare”</a> by Ovid on use.perl.org (24-February-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://use.perl.org/~davorg/journal/38549">"MySQL Stupidity" on
-davorg's use.perl.org blog</a> (25-February-2009)
+<a href="http://use.perl.org/~davorg/journal/38549">“MySQL Stupidity” on
+davorg’s use.perl.org blog</a> (25-February-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/38563">Ovid: "Throwing Away
-All of My Trigger Work"</a> (27-February-2009)
+<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/38563">Ovid: “Throwing Away
+All of My Trigger Work”</a> (27-February-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/38578">Ovid: "Trigger and SUPER
-and Ovid's *LIES*!"</a> (02-March-2009)
+<a href="http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/38578">Ovid: “Trigger and SUPER
+and Ovid’s *LIES*!”</a> (02-March-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://idkn.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/mysql-again/">Ido Kanner: 
-"Problems with MySQL Again"</a> (in Hebrew) (02-March-2009)
+Problems with MySQL Again</a> (in Hebrew) (02-March-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://blog.some-abstract-type.com/2009/03/mysql-51-mysqlhotcopy-and-log-tables.html">Some 
-Abstract Type! - "MySQL 5.1 mysqlhotcopy and log tables: check your backup 
-scripts!"</a> (12-March-2009)
+Abstract Type! - “MySQL 5.1 mysqlhotcopy and log tables: check your backup 
+scripts!”</a> (12-March-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://idkn.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/why-i-find-mysql-to-be-so-bad/">Ido
-Kanner: "Why I find MySQL to be so bad"</a> (15-March-2009)
+Kanner: Why I find MySQL to be so bad</a> (15-March-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/30/228214">Slashdot:
-"Locating the Real MySQL"</a> (30-March-2009)
+Locating the Real MySQL</a> (30-March-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/which_sql_is_mysql">Steven J. 
-Vaughan-Nichols: "Which SQL is MySQL?"</a> (31-March-2009)
+Vaughan-Nichols: Which SQL is MySQL?</a> (31-March-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/329626/">LWN.net: "A Look at the MySQL
-Forks"</a> (22-April-2009)
+<a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/329626/">LWN.net: “A Look at the MySQL
+Forks”</a> (22-April-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/23/134208">"Sun
-Announces New MySQL, Michael Widenius Forks"</a> - on Slashdot (23-April-2009)
+<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/23/134208">“Sun
+Announces New MySQL, Michael Widenius Forks”</a> - on Slashdot (23-April-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/who-owns-commercial-open-source-%E2%80%93-and-can-forks-work">"Who 
-Owns Commercial Open Source – and Can Forks Work?"</a> - by Glyn Moody,
+<a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/who-owns-commercial-open-source-%E2%80%93-and-can-forks-work">“Who 
+Owns Commercial Open Source – and Can Forks Work?”</a> - by Glyn Moody,
 on LinuxJournal (23-April-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/21535/MySQL_Forked_Beyond_Repair_">"MySQL:
-Forked Beyond Repair?"</a> - on OSNews.com (21-May-2009)
+<a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/21535/MySQL_Forked_Beyond_Repair_">“MySQL:
+Forked Beyond Repair?”</a> - on OSNews.com (21-May-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/21/2040220">"Has
-MySQL Forked Beyond Repair?"</a> - on Slashdot (21-May-2009)
+<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/21/2040220">“Has
+MySQL Forked Beyond Repair?”</a> - on Slashdot (21-May-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/12/13/1530211/Widenius-Warns-Against-MySQL-Falling-Into-Oracles-Hands">"Widenius Warns Against MySQL Falling Into Oracle's Hands"</a> - on Slashdot (13-December-2009)
+<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/12/13/1530211/Widenius-Warns-Against-MySQL-Falling-Into-Oracles-Hands">“Widenius Warns Against MySQL Falling Into Oracle’s Hands”</a> - on Slashdot (13-December-2009)
 </li>
 
 <li>
-<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/09/20/2219254/PostgreSQL-90-Released">"PostgreSQL
-9.0 Released"</a> - on Slashdot (20-September-2010).
+<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/09/20/2219254/PostgreSQL-90-Released">“PostgreSQL
+9.0 Released”</a> - on Slashdot (20-September-2010).
 </li>
 
 <li>
 <a href="http://art-blog.no-ip.info/newpress/blog/post/270">Artyom Tonkikh:
-"MySQL is indeed a toy - 
-or rollback mysteriously does not work with InnoDB"</a> - in Hebrew. 
+“MySQL is indeed a toy - 
+or rollback mysteriously does not work with InnoDB”</a> - in Hebrew. 
 (27-November-2010)
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 <p>
-<a href="http://sqlanywhere.blogspot.com/2008/03/unpublished-mysql-faq.html">"SQL
-Anywhere: Unpublished MySQL FAQ"</a>
+<a href="http://sqlanywhere.blogspot.com/2008/03/unpublished-mysql-faq.html">“SQL
+Anywhere: Unpublished MySQL FAQ”</a>
 </p>
 </li>