shlomi-fish-homepage / lib / docbook / 5 / xml / case-for-drug-legalisation-v3.xml

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
<?xml version='1.0' encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="docbook-css/driver.css" type="text/css"?>

<article xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" version="5.0" xml:id="index" xml:lang="en">
    <info>
        <title>The Case for Drug Legalisation</title>
        <authorgroup>
            <author>
                <personname>
                    <firstname>Shlomi</firstname>
                    <surname>Fish</surname>
                </personname>
                <affiliation>
                    <address>
                        <email>shlomif@shlomifish.org</email>
                        <uri type="homepage" xlink:href="http://www.shlomifish.org/">Shlomi Fish’s Homepage</uri>
                    </address>
                </affiliation>
            </author>
         </authorgroup>
         <copyright>
             <year>2006</year>
            <holder>Shlomi Fish</holder>
        </copyright>
      <legalnotice xml:id="main_legal_notice">
            <para>
<!--Creative Commons License-->
This work is licensed under the <link xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/">Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Licence</link> (or at your option a greater version of it).
		<!--/Creative Commons License--><!-- <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
		<Work rdf:about="">
			<license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/" />
	<dc:title>The Case for File Swapping</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2005</dc:date>
	<dc:description>An essay that explains why Internet File Swapping (using Peer-to-Peer networks, etc.) is not only moral and ethical, but also should be legal, and cannot be banned. Discusses other issues.</dc:description>
	<dc:creator><Agent><dc:title>Shlomi Fish</dc:title></Agent></dc:creator>
	<dc:rights><Agent><dc:title>Shlomi Fish</dc:title></Agent></dc:rights>
	<dc:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text" />
		</Work>
		<License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/"><permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Reproduction"/><permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Distribution"/><requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Notice"/><requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Attribution"/><permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/DerivativeWorks"/></License></rdf:RDF> -->                
            </para>
        </legalnotice>

        <revhistory>
            <revision>
                <revnumber>5374</revnumber>
                <date>4 June 2012</date>
                <authorinitials>shlomif</authorinitials>
                <revremark>
                    Add the two Calamities of Nature strips. This is the third
                    version.
                </revremark>
            </revision>
            <revision>
                <revnumber>5270</revnumber>
                <date>28 April 2012</date>
                <authorinitials>shlomif</authorinitials>
                <revremark>
                    Add the section about drug users who become drug dealers
                    becoming exposed to more drugs. Add the section about
                    drug users forming a subculture and tending to associate
                    with one another. Add the part about “buying as much as
                    one can afford”.
                </revremark>
            </revision>
            <revision>
                <revnumber>3284</revnumber>
                <date>2 January 2009</date>
                <authorinitials>shlomif</authorinitials>
                <revremark>
                    Converted to DocBook 5 and added the section 
                    “Note about Why Politicians Support The Prohibition”.
                </revremark>
            </revision>
            <revision>
                <revnumber>1801</revnumber>
                <date>29 February 2008</date>
                <authorinitials>shlomif</authorinitials>
                <revremark>
                    Fixed some typos, added the “What you can do about it?”
                    section and added the “Links” section.
                </revremark>
            </revision>
            <revision>
                <revnumber>1548</revnumber>
                <date>28 July 2006</date>
                <authorinitials>shlomif</authorinitials>
                <revremark>
                    Finished the first published version.
                </revremark>
            </revision>
            <revision>
                <revnumber>1518</revnumber>
                <date>14 October 2005</date>
                <authorinitials>shlomif</authorinitials>
                <revremark>
                    Forked the text from a previous document, and starting to 
                    adapt it.
                </revremark>
            </revision>
        </revhistory>
    </info>

<section xml:id="introduction">
    <info>
        <title>Introduction</title>
    </info>
    <para>
        Many people take the prohibition on the currently illegal narcotics
        (e.g: Marijuana, Cocaine, Heroine) for granted. They believe that
        just because the drugs are physically harmful, they should be banned.
        Yet, this is very far from the fact. While drugs can be harmful, there 
        is no good reason to make them illegal. In fact, the prohibition on
        drugs causes so many undesirable side-effects, that they
        <emphasis role="bold">must</emphasis> be made legal.
    </para>
    <para>
        If this sounds fantastic to you - read on, I’m sure you’ll find out 
        that I know what I’m saying.
    </para>
    <para>
        The war on drugs has been supported by both the left and right political
        camps, and has only been rejected by Libertarians and various other
        minority groups who hold this view. As a result, most people who
        believe they should choose between left, right or middle, think drug
        prohibition is acceptable on everybody. But this is not the case. The
        prohibition on drugs is very harmful to the public and individual 
        well-being and must be eradicated as soon as possible.
    </para>
</section>


<section xml:id="morality">
    <info>
        <title>The Morality of Drug Abuse</title>
    </info>
    <para>
        A person has a basic right to harm himself, as long as he does not harm
        others in the process. That’s because everyone of us is the owner of 
        his mind, body and property, and is solely responsible for their use
        and abuse. 
    </para>
    <para>
        All arguments that do not favour that, like that a person thus 
        contributes less to society, and becomes a burden on it are pretty
        silly. That’s because a person is never obliged to contribute to
        society (“First, do not harm”), and the society at large is not
        obliged to support its members. (It would be Socialistic to claim
        otherwise.)
    </para>
    <para>
        Thus, a person must be allowed by law to consume drugs. I’m not saying
        it is desirable if a person exercises this right. I’m just saying that
        a person should be allowed to do so, just as he is allowed to smoke,
        drink alocholic beverages, deteriorate in personal hygiene, give away
        money for no good reason, act stupidly, etc. These are all harmful
        activities, yet perfectly legitimate.
    </para>
</section>

<section xml:id="biology">
    <info>
        <title>The Biology of Drug Use</title>
    </info>
    <para>
        Drugs are not as harmful as many people think. Most drug users
        are perfectly healthy people who just happen to have a drug problem,
        just like people who smoke, or are alcholics, or are
        addicted to caffeine have a drug problem. Otherwise, they are able
        to function properly and be good citizens. There are no recorded 
        deaths from Marijuana in the U.S. The amount of deaths for Cocaine
        is 20 per 100,000 (4 if we take into account such factors as its 
        reduced quality), and the deaths from Heroin are 400 per 100,000 (or
        80 if we take these factors into account). This is compared to 150
        deaths per 100,000 from Alcohol and 650 from Tobacco. Taking the
        numbers into account, in the U.S. there used to be 390,000 deaths 
        per year from Tobacco, 150,000 from Alcohol and only 400 from Heroin
        and 200 from Cocaine (and none from Marijuana).
        (<link xlink:href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa121.html">Source</link>.)
    </para>
    <para>
        Thus, legalising drugs, which would potentially make them more 
        common, will not be a hazard to the global health status of the
        population.
    </para>
</section>

<section xml:id="bio_psychology">
    <info>
        <title>The Bio-Psychology of Drug Use</title>
    </info>
    <para>
        The mere act of consuming illegal narcotics, usually does not cause
        one to commits crimes. While drugs affect the mind, a large
        increase in drug consumption by itself will not cause a large 
        increase in the number of crimes committed.
    </para>
    <para>
        Note that criminal activity is often related to drug use due to its
        present illegal nature and the fact drug users steal in order to
        acquire drugs. (or other drug related crimes.) However, this is not
        a direct result of the bio-psychological effects of the drugs
        themselves.
    </para>
</section>

<section xml:id="arguments_for">
    <info>
        <title>Arguments for Drug Legalisation</title>
    </info>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__inflation_of_crime">
        <info>
            <title>The Prohibition on Drugs Causes an Inflation of Crime</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            As drugs are illegal, they are being marketed by outlaws, who
            charge an inflated price for them. Much more inflated that the
            amount it requires to grow, manufacture and distribute them.
            As a result, there is a growing black market for the distribution
            of drugs and drug users eventually need to commit crimes like
            theft and robbery to support their habits.
        </para>
        <para>
            The average crime rate in the U.S increased twice fold due to the
            prohibition on Alcohol. Once the prohibition was lifted, it
            decreased back to its original state. It is expected that
            drug-induced crimes cause a similar increase, due to the similar
            nature of this prohibition.
        </para>
        <para>
            In this analysis one should also include the very “crimes” of drug
            use, trafficing, and sale, as well as crimes caused due to the
            criminal nature of some drug dealers. Drug trafficing is also a
            huge source of income for Organised crime.
        </para>
        <para>
            All of this crime can be eliminated in a swift blow by legalising
            drugs. When drugs will become legal, they will be produced,
            distributed and sold by local legitimate entities, who will be
            subject to Capitalistic market constraints. Their prices will
            drop to a minimum, allowing everybody to buy them at the
            needed quantities. Criminals will no longer be able to make a 
            decent living from selling them in the black market (as there will
            be none.).
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__not_helping">
        <info>
            <title>The War on Drugs does not Help to Fight them</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            Law enforcement organisations attempt to stop drug trade by
            catching drug shipments, and drug dealers. However, any shipment
            or dealer that is caught, has only one effect: a temporary increase
            in the price of drugs at the location to which they were intended. 
            Most drug shipments and transactions are never stopped, and it is
            a pointless struggle to try to stop them.
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__quality_decrease">
        <info>
            <title>The Prohibition on Drugs Lowers the
                Quality of Drugs</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            Illegal drugs are not sold in the free market and as a result the
            sold good is subject to the whims of the local outlaw manufacturer 
            or distributor. As a result, they often have reduced quality, which
            can cause a lot of unnecessary health side-effects on their users,
            including many deaths.
        </para>
        <para>
            During the prohibition on alcohol it was observed that the quality
            of alcoholic beverages has heavily decreased, and the same thing 
            happens now with the currently illegal drugs.
        </para>
        <para>
            Since it is hard to find high quality drugs, when drugs of a
            high quality are found the drug user will buy as much of it as they
            can afford, especially if it's a good deal and therefore they will
            have a much larger quantity around than they normally would have
            and therefore tend to do it more.
        </para>

        <para>
            Imagine that liquor fluctuated in price and quality. You go to
            the store and sometimes there are harmful chemicals in the liquor,
            sometimes the prices are extremely high, sometimes there is no
            liquor at the store at all.  Only once in a blue moon are prices
            very good and quality good (say, it only happens once a
            year). In that case, you would buy as much as you could afford.
            Naturally, people who only use alcohol might not agree with this,
            but that's because they have never been in that situation, since
            alcoholic beverages are fully legal.
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__causes_proliferation">
        <info>
            <title>The Prohibition on Drugs Causes Proliferation of 
            Drugs’ Use</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            People who become heavy drug users often need to find a way to
            finance their habit. As a result, they often become drug dealers
            themselves, and try to push drugs onto other people,
            including children.
        </para>
        <para>
            Furthermore, once they become dealers they become exposed to
            an even wider variety of drugs than before, and they are likely to 
            try drugs that they never would have before because drugs are
            essentially free to them.  And a great way to push drugs on people
            is to consume drugs with them.  So, to make more money, they 
            end up consuming more drugs.
        </para>
        <para>
            Making drugs legal will stop this vicious cycle. The price of
            drugs will drop to free market levels, and people will not need
            to become drug dealers themselves to finance their habit.
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__lower_sectors_progress">
        <info>
            <title>Slowdown of the Progress of Lower Sectors</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            Drug dealing in a society where drugs are criminalised is
            a way to make a lot of money. As a result, young people among 
            the poor find selling drugs an easy way to earn their living
            and escape the more demanding path of working in an honest job.
        </para>
        <para>
            This causes a bad effect on the societies in poor neighbourhoods, 
            who turn to drug dealing instead of advancing their rank in the
            honest world. Making drugs legal will kill this easy way out, and
            force the young people of the poor to struggle for a honest living
            and gradually advance their personal and collective financial
            status.
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__unholy_enemy">
        <info>
            <title>Drug Users Serve as the “Unholy Enemy” of Society</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            There is a common pattern in history of “unholy enemies” - 
            groups of people who are presented by leaders to be of such
            evil nature that the general populace should be willing to
            sacrifice their lives, freedom or well-being to fight them.
            These have been the Jews in Nazi Germany, and the Kafirs in 
            Islam. In modern society, drug users now serve as an unholy
            enemy for which the government can undermine
            <link xlink:href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism">Liberalism</link>
            and gradually repress the people.
        </para>
        <para>
            Yet, drug users are no such enemy - they do not pose a threat
            to society. Plus, they are people in need of help, not in need of
            being hunted and prosecuted.
        </para>
        <para>
            The legalisation of drugs will put a stop to the irrational
            trend to make drug users an unholy enemy and for the
            government to undermine the individual rights of the citizens.
            There is no good reason to undermine individual rights, much less
            one that is useless and pointless as trying to “win” the war on
            drugs.
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__abusive_behaviour">
        <info>
            <title>The Prohibition Causes an Abusive Behaviour among
            the Users</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            Since drugs are illegal and using them can jail a person,
            drug users usually exhibit abusive behaviours: they lie, steal,
            and become dishonest and suspicious. This is not an effect of the
            drug itself - it’s a result of the psychological and legal
            situation in which they are present. By legalising drugs, one can
            be sure that drug users will be able to openly admit their
            problems, and seek help.
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__forming_a_subculture">
        <info>
            <title>Drug Users Form a Subculture</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            Drug users tend to associate with other drug
            users, because non drug users do not understand drug use and have a
            preconceived idea that they are intrinsically bad, therefore drug
            users are always around other drug users, and likely always around
            drugs, and therefore tend to do them more. When breaking a habit,
            you must stop your enablers, but drug users eventually mostly have
            other drug users as friends, so it is very hard to break the habit
            of drug use even after it becomes a problem because they are always
            around drugs and other users and it takes a large amount of will
            power to refuse taking drugs when one is around it all the time.
        </para>
        <para>
            As a result, drug users form a 
            <emphasis role="bold">subculture</emphasis>. The drug user ends up 
            alienated from his or her non-drug using friends. However,
            the cause is not the drug or the drug problem, it is the illegal 
            stance society takes on drugs. One is a criminal if they possess 
            drugs, so they will not do this openly, yet they can do this 
            somewhat openly among the drug-using subculture, and possessing 
            drugs in that subculture makes you high status in that 
            subculture. Drugs and especially good quality drugs are of 
            a higher value in that subculture, than being rich.
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__legit_uses">
        <info>
            <title>Prevention of Legitimate Uses</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            The prohibition of illegal drugs prevents some legitimate uses
            of the plants from which they are made. The most prominent examples
            are paper that can be made out of Hemp, but is now made out of
            cut-down trees instead (which is certainly not good for the
            environment), and the various medical uses of Marijuana.
        </para>
    </section>
    <section xml:id="arguments_for__jailing_people">
        <info>
            <title>Strain on Society due to People in Jail</title>
        </info>
        <para>
            The prohibition on drugs puts many people in Jail - there
            are over 1 million prisoners for drug offences in the United
            States. There are even more if we consider drug-induced offences
            such as drug-induced theft.
        </para>
        <para>
            These prisoners are a large strain on society which needs to 
            support them. They also prevent more serious criminals from
            being jailed, which undermines the punishment and
            rehabilitation system of the government.
        </para>
        <para>
            The legalisation of drugs will free the prisons from false
            criminals, and restore justice. And the lawful people will no
            longer need to support hundreds of thousands of jailed drug users 
            and dealers.
        </para>
    </section>
</section>


<section xml:id="note_about_politicians_supporting_the_prohibition">

    <info>
        <title>Note about Why Politicians Support The Prohibition</title>
    </info>

    <para>
        It is well known that many politicians or people who hold government
        positions support the prohibition on drugs. As a result, many people
        are likely to conclude that they are being bribed by Mafia Dons and
        other high-profile criminal people who make their livelihood 
        off the prohibition. This may actually be the case to some extent,
        but it’s not the only possible explanation for why they support it.
    </para>

    <para>
        There are two other explanations for why politicians, who are still
        honest enough to not accept bribes from drug-trafficing criminals,
        may still support the prohibition on drugs. The first is that they
        are simply clueless or misled enough to believe that the prohibition
        is a good thing. Many ordinary and perfectly honest people have also
        bought the pro-prohibition advocacy and voice opinions supporting it. 
    </para>

    <para>
        The other explanation is that some of these people know better and are
        acting 
        <link xlink:href="http://shlomif.livejournal.com/42320.html">in an evil,
            destructive, and dishonest manner</link>. Acting and thinking
        in an evil way can become an obsession and an addiction, and some
        people have become terminally infected by it and are consistently
        acting in an evil manner. While it may be true that one should not
        <link xlink:href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor">
            “attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”</link>, malice is still present in the world,
        including among the leaders.
    </para>

    <para>
        As a result, even if such officials are not accepting bribes, they
        are still not acting out of the public’s best-interest when they
        support the prohibition of drugs.
    </para>

</section>

<section xml:id="summary">
    <info>
        <title>Summary</title>
    </info>
    <para>
        The prohibition against Drugs is the real drug problem. It is a war
        against the people, that consumes lives, money, and property. It has
        no good reason. History tells us that all the past prohibitions on
        narcotics failed miserably. The current prohibition on drugs is no
        different.
    </para>
</section>
<section xml:id="what_you_can_do_about_it">
    <info>
        <title>What You can do about it?</title>
    </info>
    <para>
        Here is a list of things you can do to help the cause of fighting
        for drug legalisation:
    </para>
    <orderedlist>
        <listitem>
            <para>
                <emphasis role="bold">Educate people about it</emphasis>:
                write something pro drug legalistation online, in blogs,
                mailing lists, newsgroups, web forums; write your school
                report about it; publish articles about it in newspapers,
                tell about it to your friends, etc.
            </para>
            <para>
                Note that you should feel free to link to this article, or
                even quote its text, as long as you give attribution. (See
                <link xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/">its
                    open-content, Creative Commons, licence for more 
                    information.</link>
            </para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
            <para>
                <emphasis role="bold">Contact Your Government</emphasis> -
                write to your representatives and government, and tell them
                why the prohibition on drugs is harmful and not justified. If
                possible, vote for representatives that support the 
                legalisation of drugs.
            </para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
            <para>
                <emphasis role="bold">Don’t work against the cause</emphasis>
                - if you’re a drug-enforcing policeman, then switch to a
                different department, or quit. If you’re an agent of the
                <link xlink:href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_Enforcement_Administration">Drug 
                    Enforcement Administration (DEA)</link> or a similar 
                organisation - then quit.
            </para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
            <para>
                Last, but not least - <emphasis role="bold">don’t use illegal 
                    narcotics</emphasis>. They
                have numerous bad medical effects, and using them reduces
                your credibility as someone who can speak against their 
                prohibition. 
            </para>
        </listitem>
    </orderedlist>

    <para>
        By acting and propagating the understanding that drugs should 
        be legalised, we can eventually create a strong, vibrant
        movement against the prohibition on drugs, that can eventually
        abolish it completely.
    </para>
</section>

<section xml:id="links">
    <info>
        <title>Links</title>
    </info>
    <itemizedlist>
        <listitem>
            <para>
                <link xlink:href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa121.html">James 
                    Ostrowski’s “Thinking about Drug Legalization”</link> is an 
                excellent and detailed article about the problems of drug 
                prohibition.
            </para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
            <para>
                The English Wikipedia has an 
                <link xlink:href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_(drugs)">article 
                    
                    written on the Prohibition on drugs</link> from a hopefully 
                Neutral Point of View.
            </para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
            <para>
                The web site 
                <link xlink:href="http://www.drugwarfacts.org/">“Drug War Facts”</link> was recommended to me by a 
                libertarian correspondant. I didn’t fully read it yet.
            </para> 
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
            <para>
                <link xlink:href="http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/">The Schaffer
                    Library of Drug Policy</link> is a comprehensive site for
                support of the legalisation of drugs. It contains a 
                <link xlink:href="http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/dea/">copy of 
                    the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) site, with 
                    comments</link> and especially a step-by-step
                <link xlink:href="http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/dea/pubs/legaliz/claims.htm">rebuttal of their 
                    “Speaking Out against Drug Legalisation” 
                    document</link>.
            </para>
        </listitem>
        
        <listitem>
            <para>
                The online comic series 
                <link xlink:href="http://www.calamitiesofnature.com/"><emphasis>Calamities 
                        of Nature</emphasis></link> (which I am very fond of)
                has two related strips:
                <link xlink:href="http://www.calamitiesofnature.com/archive/?c=565">“Caffeine Ban”</link>
                and <link xlink:href="http://calamitiesofnature.com/archive/?c=427">“Going Dutch”</link>.
            </para>
        </listitem>

    </itemizedlist>
</section>
</article>    <!-- End of the article -->
Tip: Filter by directory path e.g. /media app.js to search for public/media/app.js.
Tip: Use camelCasing e.g. ProjME to search for ProjectModifiedEvent.java.
Tip: Filter by extension type e.g. /repo .js to search for all .js files in the /repo directory.
Tip: Separate your search with spaces e.g. /ssh pom.xml to search for src/ssh/pom.xml.
Tip: Use ↑ and ↓ arrow keys to navigate and return to view the file.
Tip: You can also navigate files with Ctrl+j (next) and Ctrl+k (previous) and view the file with Ctrl+o.
Tip: You can also navigate files with Alt+j (next) and Alt+k (previous) and view the file with Alt+o.