Shlomi Fish  committed 4ab2e6d

Add more.

  • Participants
  • Parent commits 2d63e98
  • Branches default

Comments (0)

Files changed (2)

File docs/why-lisp-is-unpopular/Makefile

+DOC = Why-Lisp-is-Unpopular
+ASCIIDOC = $(DOC).txt
+HTML = $(DOC).html
+DOCBOOK = $(DOC).xml
+PDF = $(DOC).pdf
+all: $(HTML)
+pdf: $(PDF)
+	asciidoc $<
+	asciidoc --backend=docbook $<
+upload: $(HTML)
+	rsync -v --progress -a $(HTML) $(ASCIIDOC) $(PDF) $(DOCBOOK) $$HOMEPAGE_SSH_PATH/spark-n9
+	docmake -v -o $@ pdf $<

File docs/why-lisp-is-unpopular/Why-Lisp-is-Unpopular.txt

+park - Pre-Birth of a Modern Lisp
+Author: Shlomi Fish
+TODO : Fill in.
+No good handling of text and "octet streams"
+* UNIX/C/TCP/IP's managing of octet streams and sequences vs. Lisp's object 
+handling (not necessarily in the OOP sense).
+* A good language should have support for both - Perl starting from 5,
+Python, Ruby.
+* No interpolation.
+* No regexes (can be implemented but non-standard).
+* People keep telling me to use Domain Specific languages (DSLs) to build a 
+syntax methodically instead of agreeing that a templating system is a good 
+idea. ("Less is more" as opposed to TIMTOWTDI).
+** Don't output SQL directly - use a DSL - no support for something like 
+$dbh->quote() or placeholders in CLSQL.
+* No support for interpolation.
+* No support for here-docs.
+* You need to write a DSL instead of just outputting the text the way
+you want and getting on with the rest of your life.
+* Conclusion: good text support is needed, if you want to attract 
+Perl 5 / Python / Ruby / JS / whatever hackers. 
+** And there are likely very few programmer-wannabes who will be influenced by 
+people who are not their elders or their superiors, so it's a vicious cycle.
+Competing implementations
+* Scheme has a very large number of implementations for a given platform (C,
+JVM, etc.).
+* Writing a Scheme implementation seems to be a rite of passage:
+** A Schemer on #scheme admitted that he hadn't written a Scheme implementation
+yet so he doesn't know it too well.
+* Many of these implementations end up as dinky open-source projects.
+* Probably a symptom of a language being too simple and minimalistic.
+* You don't see Perl 5, Python or Ruby people writing their own implementation
+for enlightenment.