Commits

Shlomi Fish committed 74cedf3

[English-DocBook] More punctuation fixes.

Comments (0)

Files changed (1)

English-Docbook/The-Enemy-English.db5.xml

   <para>Furthermore, a man who positioned a gun at the forehead of another man and shot him, is not responsible for killing him. All he wanted was that the bullet will be emitted from the barrel, or even just for the trigger to be set backwards!”</para>
   <para>“Speaking about bombardments,”, the interviewer said, “many criticisms were directed at the Enemy for hurting the civilians among you, although they are only trying to hurt the Organisation's soldiers. As someone who is now an objective viewer, do you think those criticisms are justified?”</para>
   <para>“What do you mean?” I asked, “I have always been completely objective.”</para>
-  <para>“But you served in the Organisation!”, the physicist burst, “the Organisation tries to hurt the soldiers or even the civilians of the Enemy, who are innocent. In my opinion, you were a criminal.”</para>
+  <para>“But you served in the Organisation!” the physicist burst, “The Organisation tries to hurt the soldiers or even the civilians of the Enemy, who are innocent. In my opinion, you were a criminal.”</para>
   <para>“You are right,” I told him, “ But I was a criminal in an objective manner.”</para>
   <para>“Let's get back to the question. Are the accusations against the Enemy's Military justified?” The interviewer addressed me again.</para>
-  <para>“Absolutely.”, I replied, “Even if they were completely accurate, they would have hurt the Organisation's soldiers and kill them.”</para>
+  <para>“Absolutely.” I replied, “Even if they were completely accurate, they would have hurt the Organisation's soldiers and kill them.”</para>
   <para>“But we just agreed they were criminals!”, the physicist said in half-bewilderment, half-anger.</para>
   <para>“And wait - is it justified to kill a criminal? Is the stealer from a thief exempt?”</para>
   <para>“So, you are a pacifist?”</para>