Commits

(no ...@adde3d42-e9b9-0310-bad2-9dfefc8ea29a  committed a53e4bf

Corrected "at the first place" to "in the first place".

  • Participants
  • Parent commits 7e19acf

Comments (0)

Files changed (1)

File The-Enemy-English.xhtml

 <p>“I'll do my best, sir.” I told him with a snap while I signed it. Then I rose up and we shook hands. I thought a little about what the commander just said, and then recalled something and sat down. "Look, it may no longer be so relevant" I said to him "but I’ve been a member of the Organisation for two years and nobody ever told me what the philosophy of the Organisation was. What is it, really?"</p>
 <p>"Ah… the philosophy? I am surprised that it hadn’t been presented to you yet. In any case, I’d be happy to give you an answer, the ex-Member of the Organisation. Now, how should I start? Oh, I know. So here goes:</p>
 <p>The philosophy of the Organisation is very simple: our goal is to fight the Enemy with all our power. It is a holy war of our people against that criminal nation, and even though the well being of our people and its future are not at stake, it’s a war of the utmost importance. At least according to what we are told all the time or that we keep telling each other.</p>
-<p>We must sacrifice everything in order to achieve this purpose by our struggle with the Enemy, even the lives of the members of our people, which for their interest we are acting at the first place. And we have indeed done it successfully, and when I look back I realise one thing: we have been doing it and we are still doing it, despite all the difficulties. True – we had some difficult times. But they were nothing compared to the almost impossible times, which we usually have to operate in.</p>
+<p>We must sacrifice everything in order to achieve this purpose by our struggle with the Enemy, even the lives of the members of our people, which for their interest we are acting in the first place. And we have indeed done it successfully, and when I look back I realise one thing: we have been doing it and we are still doing it, despite all the difficulties. True – we had some difficult times. But they were nothing compared to the almost impossible times, which we usually have to operate in.</p>
 <p>However, since we began fighting the Enemy, we’ve noticed the existence of a major obstacle that hinders us. Actually it’s not a physical obstacle but a metaphysical and abstract term, and as such is supposed to be of no significance. Yet, the popularity of this term made dealing with it an inevitable fact. My friend, even if we had accepted a very mild interpretation of it, we would have found ourselves bounded by all sorts of invisible and impractical rules; we would have been in infinite conflicts and on top of all, the ambition of our soldiers to fight would have declined enormously. This term is ‘Morality’. </p>
 <p>Therefore, we have decided to accept the philosophical equation ‘Morality = no morality’."</p>
 <p>"Wait a second." I interrupted him, "are you referring to the assumption that the end justifies the means?"</p>
 <p>My labs are in progressive stages of writing the patent on the improved manufacturing process, and I hope my colleagues and I will receive a generous sum of money from the royalties on the patent."</p>
 <p>"I hope it will be so, because you probably invested a lot of works in its development."</p>
 <p>"Yes. Definitely."</p>
-<p>"That's all for now, Doctor. I ask you to stay here in the studio to receive our next guest, which many of the viewers waited to see the interview with him impatiently. This is a man which is so logical that it's practically scary. A man, whose actions have implications on the whole world. A media hero, that a week ago no one knew who he was. Is he a hero for a moment, or a new star was born in the skies of the world's politics?</p>
+<p>"That's all for now, Doctor. I ask you to stay here in the studio to receive our next guest, which many of the viewers waited to see the interview with him impatiently. This is a man who is frighteningly logical. A man, whose actions have implications on the whole world. A media hero, that a week ago no one knew who he was. Is he a hero for a moment, or has a new star been born in the skies of the world's politics?</p>
 <p>Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome the ex-Member of the Organisation!!"</p>
 <p>This was my queue to come in, and so I entered the studio to the tempered claps of the audience that sat there. I went in the direction of the interviewer, greeted the people who were present, and shook her hand and the hand of the physicist. Right after that, I sat down in one of the guest's chairs that were vacant next to the physicists. And then the interview began.</p>
-<p>The interviewer waited for the end of the hand-clapping, while moving here gaze from the audience in the studio to the physicist and me. After there was silence, she looked towards me and said: "The ex-Member, I must say we are very happy to have you here on our show. Tell me: how do you feel here, in the other part of the world?"</p>
+<p>The interviewer waited for the end of the hand-clapping, while moving her gaze from the audience in the studio to the physicist and me. After there was silence, she looked towards me and said: "The ex-Member, I must say we are very happy to have you here on our show. Tell me: how do you feel here, in the other part of the world?"</p>
 <p>"Excellent. The conditions are much more comfortable than what I'm usually used to." I answered.</p>
 <p>"Very well. " She said, "Please tell us a bit about your service in the Organisation? How did you feel back then?"</p>
-<p>"Oh, it was definitely an illustrative service. However, there was one thing which bothered both me and my late comrades: they kept lecturing to us how bad the Enemy was and why we must fight it. I think half of our training time was wasted on such lectures. We knew the Enemy was bad, and that was the reason we joined the Organisation at the first place!</p>
+<p>"Oh, it was definitely an illustrative service. However, there was one thing which bothered both me and my late comrades: they kept lecturing to us how bad the Enemy was and why we must fight it. I think half of our training time was wasted on such lectures. We knew the Enemy was bad, and that was the reason we joined the Organisation in the first place!</p>
 <p>In my opinion, it was completely unnecessary. Perhaps they thought that without those brain-washes we would have reached the conclusion that there is no rational behind the activity against the Enemy. Most of us reached this conclusion a few months, if not less, after we joined the Organisation and we still kept fighting. So they didn't have a reason to go to this length and just bother us."</p>
 <p>"Yet, you are content with your retirement from the Organisation and with your interesting suggestion for improving the efficiency of its actions?"</p>
 <p>"Of course."</p>
 <p>"Speaking of the philosophy, according to many people who live here, in the other part of the world, both the philosophy and the actions of the Organisation are completely irrational."</p>
 <p>"The Organisation thought that such a thing might happen, and therefore he printed his philosophy on a note."</p>
 <p>"I'm sorry, but I don't understand how it contributes to its validation. Everyone can write the biggest nonsense on a note, and yet it will remain illogical and subjective to whoever said it."</p>
-<p>"But this note was printed in eight billion copies, and thus there's plenty of it for every man alive, what makes it objective for all practical reasons. You can receive it from the Organisation for free, by enclosing mail payment only. Likewise, you can find it on the Internet in the following URL:</p>
-<p>http://www.the-organisation.org/reference/anti-something/Aristotle/Organum/</p>
-<p>our_philosophy.html."</p>
+<p>"But this note was printed in eight milliard copies, and thus there's plenty of it for every man alive, what makes it objective for all practical reasons. You can receive it from the Organisation for free, by enclosing mail payment only. Likewise, you can find it on the Internet in the following URL:</p>
+<p>http://www.the-organisation.org/reference/anti-something/Aristotle/Organum/our_philosophy.html."</p>
 <p>The interviewer seemed shocked for a moment. Some media experts would claim it was unprofessional, but in my opinion, it was pretty much in place. "Indeed a strong argument, and I'm sure many of the viewers would take your suggestion, and will check the philosophy of the Organisation themselves. Whether they will accept it - that it is a different question."</p>
 <p>"Well, the objectivity of a certain thing is not dependent on people accepting it."</p>
-<p class="P1"/>
 <p>"Of course. Let me move on to the next question, which interests me and probably many other people very much. It is known that both the Enemy and the Occupier invaded your country, after actions of terrorist organisations such as the Organisation caused it to lose stability. Both countries had one share or another in its destruction. Today, the Occupier occupies a large part of your country directly, and controls most of the other part with a puppet government. The Enemy, on the other hand, occupies only a small part of your country which is close to its border, for security reasons, and the condition of the people who live there, is as far as I know, not so bad. Why, if so, the residents of your country act mostly against the Enemy and not against the Occupier?"</p>
 <p>"An excellent question, Madame. There is, probably, some activity against the Occupier's army, but it is much limited and doesn't receive as much media coverage. Furthermore, it is a lot easier to fight the enemy, because the Organisation receives the support of the Supporter and the acceptance of the Occupier. Moreover, the Enemy's country, as opposed to the Occupier's country, is a free country, and therefore is committed to behave in a moral manner, even towards the members of the Organisation, that are, out of self-definition, immoral.</p>
 <p>If those reasons are not enough, then since the beginning of the Occupier's occupation, there have been peace in our country, which was disturbed only by the activity in the southern border. The civilians are happy that there's peace at last, and so they don't really mind that the country is under foreign occupation.</p>