1. Bitbucket
  2. Public Issue Tracker
  3. master

Issues

Issue #9692 wontfix

Public and private branches in one Repo (BB-10774)

TBotV63
created an issue

Hi :D

Being able to specify certain branches as public in a private repository would be a feature that many users (including me) would appreciate very much. So far to achieve a similar effect a second, opublic repository would have to be created, making branch interactions like merge and rebase almost impossible or very complicated.

Regards TBot

Comments (10)

  1. Annamária Szentpéteri

    Hi!

    Me and my co-workers would like to see that feature too, because we need to represent only the branch which contains the finished codes, but we want the others to be hidden.

    We would appreciate very much if you could do this new feature.

    Regards, Annamária

  2. Admin JustArena

    Same here. I have several branches:

    Example: master - fresh code without hidden info -> anyone can view commits and have access to it AAAAbranch - we have some custom code here, which we wont to share between devs. * BBBBbranch - some changes from master & AAAbranch merged to this branch, and time to time we need to do merge changes from previous (hidden branches) -> and make these changes in this branch, where all people to which we give access can view history of master & BBBBbranch, but will not have any access to AAAAAbranch.

    Is it possible to do something like that?

  3. Ben Echols staff

    We have no plans to implement this feature. It would be a major departure from the models on which Git and Mercurial are built, and would add significant complexity.

  4. Log in to comment