1. Tarek Ziadé
  2. distribute
  3. Issues
Issue #377 resolved

DistributionNotFound: mypackage==dev

Hatem Nassrat
created an issue

If you use

install_requires = ['mypackage==dev']

in your requirements, running any installed console scripts triggers the following exception ... some debugging shows that it finds the suitable package but decides that ==dev is part of the package name and considers them not the same!

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/hatem/.virtualenvs/masterpackage/bin/somecommand", line 5, in <module>
    from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
  File "/home/hatem/.virtualenvs/masterpackage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.31-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 2833, in <module>
    parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
  File "/home/hatem/.virtualenvs/masterpackage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.31-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 604, in resolve
    raise DistributionNotFound(req)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: mypackage==dev

to recreate this bug, follow these steps

virtualenv ~/.virtualenvs/samplepackage
source ~/.virtualenvs/samplepackage/bin/activate
pip install hg+https://bitbucket.org/nassrat/samplepackage
somescript 
# if you installed it with -e, you can even try "python setup.py test"

Comments (10)

  1. Hatem Nassrat reporter

    The same error shows up when you do python setup.py test ... it actually tries to reinstall the package by recloning it (which is fine) and then say it does not exist.

    % python setup.py test
    running test
    Checking .pth file support in .
    /home/hatem/.virtualenvs/masterpackage/bin/python -E -c pass
    Searching for mypackage==dev
    Best match: mypackage dev
    Doing hg clone from ssh://hg@dev/mypackage to /tmp/easy_install-X0R2pu/mypackage@production
    Updating to production
    Processing mypackage@production
    Writing /tmp/easy_install-X0R2pu/mypackage@production/setup.cfg
    Running setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-X0R2pu/mypackage@production/egg-dist-tmp-zTnOco
    zip_safe flag not set; analyzing archive contents...
    
    Installed /home/hatem/projects/masterpackage/mypackage-5.4.3-py2.7.egg
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "setup.py", line 48, in <module>
        test_suite='tests',
      File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
        dist.run_commands()
      File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in run_commands
        self.run_command(cmd)
      File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
        cmd_obj.run()
      File "/home/hatem/.virtualenvs/masterpackage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.31-py2.7.egg/setuptools/command/test.py", line 128, in run
        self.distribution.fetch_build_eggs(self.distribution.install_requires)
      File "/home/hatem/.virtualenvs/masterpackage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.31-py2.7.egg/setuptools/dist.py", line 246, in fetch_build_eggs
        replace_conflicting=True
      File "/home/hatem/.virtualenvs/masterpackage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.31-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 604, in resolve
        raise DistributionNotFound(req)
    pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound:mypackage==dev
    
  2. Hatem Nassrat reporter

    I have setup a couple of bitbucket repos to help recreate this bug ... here is how

    virtualenv ~/.virtualenvs/samplepackage
    source ~/.virtualenvs/samplepackage/bin/activate
    pip install hg+https://bitbucket.org/nassrat/samplepackage
    somescript 
    # if you installed it with -e, you can even try python setup.py test
    
  3. Hatem Nassrat reporter

    I dug into the code, and it seems the outcome I want may not be supported ... this bug is just a side-effect I guess ... so here is some info on what I want to accomplish.

    Basically I want that everytime I install samplepackage (from my example repo) otherpackage is downloaded and installed (at the very least installed if the version is newer).

    I accomplished this by using ==dev in the requirements ... but from what I can see, the very same reason it works is the very same reason the console scripts do not work (since they also check for the requirements being present before running).

    So my first question is, is there something I can do to get the desired effect. The second question is, why do the console scripts have to check for the presence or not of all the dependencies and refuse to run, it seems like overkill and essentially having a script refuse to run even though it would run perfectly fine (seems like a Java thing to do, being overprotective that is).

  4. Jason R. Coombs

    To the best of my knowledge, neither distribute nor setuptools have support for always upgrading dependencies. If dependencies are met (according to whatever requirement is specified), then the install is skipped. IIUC, pip is different, and will always upgrade dependencies if -U is specified, so you may consider using pip for installing your packages.

    I believe the console scripts check for the presence of the package as a sanity check to provide a consistent error message when the environment isn't configured as the script intended (and as easy_install set-up). Removing those checks would mean that removed libraries or inconsistent versions might lead to various spurious errors, rather than indicating the primary cause (the script and library are out of sync). Secondarily, setuptools supports what's called 'multi-install' where multiple versions of a package can be installed but not automatically present in the sys.path. In this case, for the script to work properly, it must 'require' that package as part of its startup. As a result, it's probably preferable to keep these checks in place.

    You bring up a very good use case, though. We will keep it in mind as the project progresses.

  5. Log in to comment