[TIME-147] display of group worksheet gadget/portlet

Issue #147 resolved
Andriy Zhdanov created an issue

the user-name does not get displayed in the group time-sheet. I see separate rows for each user but no names.
btw I think that this is an excellent gadget have used it since 3.13

By arthurpu/arthur purton on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:41:55 -0700

Comments (5)

  1. Andriy Zhdanov reporter

    I guess this is only in 2.1, please re-open if I'm wrong.

    Fixed in 2.1:

    Committed revision 159252

    By azhdanov on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:55:31 -0700

  2. Andriy Zhdanov reporter

    Hi Andrew,
    Thanks for the swift reply!
    i made a mistake , the issue affects version 2.1.

    I'll attach a screen shot,
    I also noticed that clicking on the 'Details' link brings you to a report for the single current user only.

    By arthurpu on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 03:25:58 -0700

  3. Andriy Zhdanov reporter

    Sorry, I can't see any issue with Details report of group timesheet gadget, may be if you could try to change showUsers from false to true in url you would see users really.

    If this is what you want (i.e. show users instead of summary for group), please let me know, I think I can change this default setting. Or you can adjust templates/grouptimesheet/group-timesheet.vm correspondingly yourself inside jar.

    By azhdanov on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:17:18 -0700

  4. Andriy Zhdanov reporter

    Hi Andrew,
    thanks again for your swift reply!
    I was confused by the text description in the group time-sheet gadget which refers to 'user' not 'group' : "Report displaying a user worked time sheet over a specified period. " and did'nt see that all the groups tickets were there, ( lack of caffeine!-)
    I agree with you, wrt the detailed report sheet , it's a matter of preference if you see the issues split by users or not, i'm happy to change this in the .vm if needed.

    By arthurpu on Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:18:27 -0700

  5. Andriy Zhdanov reporter

    Oh, right it's confusing, well I've adjusted description.
    Committed revision 159319

    I'm glad it is resolved.

    By azhdanov on Thu, 31 Mar 2011 04:16:35 -0700

  6. Log in to comment