- marked as enhancement
- edited description
the "for X cycles" is confusing if the test uses "every" statement too
Issue #174
open
The fault tolerance test reflects the number of failed tests rather then depending on cycles ... if the service is checked for example once per 5 cycles and we require 2 consecutive errors to trigger the event, the syntax becomes confusing:
check foobar ...
every 5 cycles
#this in fact requires 2 failures: cycle #5 and #10, not cycle #5 and #6 as the user may think because of the "cycles" word:
if failed XYZ for 2 cycles then alert
Proposed syntax (keep the old one for backward compatibility):
1.) "for X cycles":
check foobar ...
every 5 cycles
if failed XYZ for 2 times then alert
2.) "for X times within Y cycles":
check foobar ...
every 5 cycles
if failed XYZ for 2 times in 3 attempts then alert
Comments (4)
-
reporter -
reporter - changed status to on hold
-
reporter - changed status to open
-
reporter same for alert reminder
- Log in to comment