Allow Blue ranks to be WC

[Nuvelle]

This gives them access to view player details for planning, and allows them to be rewarded with a tag at age end.

[pyro]

I have been pushing for it since i came back. PvPers can plan but what stops them? Vision of who has what mp and how big SFs are... also should make countries more interesting esp now that same ranks can join same ranks. Lol it would give pvp countries more of a chance at survival as long as they still have 5 gens

Edit: this works more so early age rather then late game

[Bram (Fappy)]

I dont think it would be good as it would take the incentive away to rank to green, as we all have concluded on numerous occasions is that blue rank pvping does not help the country much, well maybe the first war it has some value, but after that its value diminishes day after day.

So no, no tags for Blue ranks

[pyro]

I understand that but lets say you have 5 gens who are not as good as planning as some pvpers. You would then limit the country and stunt the growth of it. Now most armies are full by cap* we could have wc tags start there. And honestly how do you expect early age blue ranks to "rank" without SFs. I see it as one of the problems stacks have. They mostly all rank and have 1 pvper early age. Why limit a country at start of age because he is a pvper... i dont agree with that

[Thom Merrilin]

or, just remove the "hidden" stats for blue players all together.

the WC tag does not even accomplish anything.

[Bram (Fappy)]

I completely disagree with the point Thom just made, removing hidden stats will take away all securities against easy spying.

WC tag would be a controlled option to give some blue players acces to those hidden stats.

Pyro: You make some valid points, and ofcourse WC can be given at will so not all players will have it. Still I think there should be some caution in applying this

[Nuvelle]

How about allowing WC to be given to blue ranks, but limiting it to 5-10 people at the very most?

Could also then look into WC having more power and make it a useful tag rather than just a spam tag.

[pyro]

Thanks bram =p how would you give them more power nuvelle? Well i do think that stats should still be hidden unless you are that rank or higher. That should give WC tag more power by itself instead of having someone "power rank" to gen then they can see all gen* and ups stats. Whos trained down and what not. Limiting WC tags ould help with spying and would help with low ranks who are pvping help plan. Should also help cut back on spying.

[Hans]

i think the low rank pvp is almost completely gone. i don't feel like blues feel the need of a wc tag.. if they want it , rank a lil and you're there

[Nuvelle]

I think this one has merit, but it would work best when tied in with mutliple changes. Will link to them when we have a few up.

[Nuvelle]

Possible linked changes:

Limit WC to 5/10 people Only HC/WC can hit friendly cities HC/WC can change the "tag" of armies (and only SF tagged armies can hit) to stop rogue armies

[Omar Darwish]

If you are able to give WC to blue ranks then CKing a HC is not really big a deal. In one tick he can be a blue and can plan. Without WC he cant plan properly till gen.

[Wilco Bos]

You still kill a commander in that case ;) and he also can still plan in both scenarios, its just harder and less appealing.

I like the solution of less WC tags, but I would put a bit of thinking in the "only authorized armies can hit" thing. Since that one might mess up speed ;) or lock the country when HC/WC are offline

[Ph3onix_Khan]

How about instead of the only certain people can lead sf or sf cities, the HC/LD can take the right to hit cities away for a discipline reason. say someone is being rebellious and is causing problems, the LD or HC can just grey out the attack button for em.