DESIGN: Cost increments from Intra-device edges
Issue #2
resolved
Currently, to factor administrative distance (local preference) we order the intra device edges and assign them cost in increments of the network diameter. However, that might not be right, because there might be more than one intra-device path in a end-to-end path.
What should be the increments when there are multiple such edges in the path?
Comments (2)
-
reporter -
- changed status to resolved
If the instance graph is a DAG, we scale down costs such that the cost of the downstream path will not impact the selection of a path within the current routing instance.
- Log in to comment
An example highlighting this would be nice.