Zope testrunner coverage - works or not ?
Issue #934
resolved
I am working on collective.rope (integration of SQLAlchemy and Zope2).
When running test coverage with 0.4.1, I get relevant results.
When running test coverage with 0.4.2p3, only the lines defining classes or functions are mentioned as run. IOW, only the import of my files is 'covered'.
Godefroid Chapelle gotcha@bubblenet.be
Comments (9)
-
repo owner
-
Can't replicate this on 0.4.2p3 or trunk.
--coverageseems to be working fine for me. (below.) The trunk has some changes that would effect an external user of oftestlib, but those aren't in p3.rel_0_4_2p3$ python test/dialect/sqlite.py --coverage test_extra_reserved_words (__main__.DialectTest) ... ok test_quoted_identifiers (__main__.DialectTest) ... ok test_empty_insert_nopk1 (__main__.InsertTest) ... ok test_empty_insert_nopk2 (__main__.InsertTest) ... ok test_empty_insert_pk1 (__main__.InsertTest) ... ok test_empty_insert_pk2 (__main__.InsertTest) ... ok test_empty_insert_pk3 (__main__.InsertTest) ... ok test_empty_insert_pk4 (__main__.InsertTest) ... ok test_inserts_with_spaces (__main__.InsertTest) ... ok test_date (__main__.TestTypes) ... ok ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 10 tests in 0.372s OK Preparing coverage report... Name Stmts Exec Cover ----------------------------------------------------------------- lib/sqlalchemy/__init__ 7 7 100% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/__init__ 1 1 100% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/access 268 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/firebird 258 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/information_schema 77 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/informix 315 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/maxdb 590 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/mssql 616 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/mxODBC 31 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/mysql 1013 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/oracle 449 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/postgres 454 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/sqlite 281 204 72% lib/sqlalchemy/databases/sybase 464 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/engine/__init__ 26 13 50% lib/sqlalchemy/engine/base 831 415 49% lib/sqlalchemy/engine/default 235 137 58% lib/sqlalchemy/engine/strategies 108 77 71% lib/sqlalchemy/engine/threadlocal 133 49 36% lib/sqlalchemy/engine/url 92 41 44% lib/sqlalchemy/exceptions 46 27 58% lib/sqlalchemy/ext/__init__ 0 0 100% lib/sqlalchemy/ext/activemapper 179 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/ext/assignmapper 52 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/ext/associationproxy 448 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/ext/orderinglist 75 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/ext/selectresults 19 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/ext/sessioncontext 28 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/ext/sqlsoup 140 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/interfaces 4 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/logging 47 25 53% lib/sqlalchemy/mods/__init__ 0 0 100% lib/sqlalchemy/mods/selectresults 5 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/__init__ 84 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/attributes 735 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/collections 608 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/dependency 315 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/dynamic 121 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/interfaces 210 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/mapper 908 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/properties 513 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/query 661 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/scoping 100 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/session 441 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/shard 72 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/strategies 472 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/sync 119 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/unitofwork 489 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/uowdumper 130 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/orm/util 184 0 0% lib/sqlalchemy/pool 429 193 44% lib/sqlalchemy/queue 94 23 24% lib/sqlalchemy/schema 613 328 53% lib/sqlalchemy/sql/__init__ 2 2 100% lib/sqlalchemy/sql/compiler 604 322 53% lib/sqlalchemy/sql/expression 1629 685 42% lib/sqlalchemy/sql/functions 59 40 67% lib/sqlalchemy/sql/operators 52 29 55% lib/sqlalchemy/sql/util 131 30 22% lib/sqlalchemy/sql/visitors 64 30 46% lib/sqlalchemy/topological 175 57 32% lib/sqlalchemy/types 415 169 40% lib/sqlalchemy/util 575 227 39% ----------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 18296 3131 17%...and lib/sqlalchemy/databases/sqlite.py,cover shows the regular execution path covered.
-
Account Deleted
I am not speaking of coverage of sqlalchemy itself.
I mean that I cannot test coverage of my own code when it works with 0.4.2p3 even though I can test coverage of my own code with 0.4.1.
-
- changed component to (none)
How are you setting up the coverage? Coverage for a project merly using SA also works fine for me.
-
Account Deleted
I am using Zope testrunner,
In the given module, I found the following code :
class TestTrace(trace.Trace): """Simple tracer. >>> tracer = TestTrace(None, count=False, trace=False) Simple rules for use: you can't stop the tracer if it not started and you can't start the tracer if it already started: >>> tracer.stop() Traceback (most recent call last): File 'testrunner.py' AssertionError: can't stop if not started >>> tracer.start() >>> tracer.start() Traceback (most recent call last): File 'testrunner.py' AssertionError: can't start if already started >>> tracer.stop() >>> tracer.stop() Traceback (most recent call last): File 'testrunner.py' AssertionError: can't stop if not started """ def __init__(self, options, **kw): trace.Trace.__init__(self, **kw) if options is not None: self.ignore = TestIgnore(options) self.started = False def start(self): assert not self.started, "can't start if already started" if not self.donothing: sys.settrace(self.globaltrace) threading.settrace(self.globaltrace) self.started = True def stop(self): assert self.started, "can't stop if not started" if not self.donothing: sys.settrace(None) threading.settrace(None) self.started = False -
- changed title to Zope testrunner coverage might be broken by 0.4.2p3
-
- removed milestone
i haven't be able to replicate any issues with coverage, so i'm putting this on hold for the moment. i'd be happy to dig into it with a
collective.ropecheckout- i'd just need some pointers on how to set that up that environment. -
repo owner
- changed title to Zope testrunner coverage - works or not ?
- changed milestone to blue sky
-
repo owner
- changed status to wontfix
coverage works in recent versions of 0.6 and also 0.7.
- Log in to comment
assigning to jek - jek did we move around the relationship of imports vs. when coverage is imported/switched on ? i forget the exact mechanics of this issue but its related to that.