- attached InteractivosBodicePattern.val
Improve feature: Seam Allowance 'Bias' options useful only when seam is vertical or horizontal
In v.0.4.2.0 tried to create a .25cm seam allowance width around a neckline curve. The options in the Seam Allowance tool include a 'Bias' offset for x & y values.
The user must use a calculator to create an accurate seam allowance width when the seam allowance is neither vertical (90 degrees) or horizontal (180 degrees).
This approach may need additional tweaking or redesign.
Comments (16)
-
reporter -
reporter This approach works well if the offset is horizontal or vertical. Here is an example of a vertical offset where this method works:
-
reporter - attached InteractivosBodicePattern2.val
-
reporter Here is an example where it seems to work well, but the width of the resulting seam allowance is unknown.
-
reporter - attached InteractivosBodicePattern3.val
-
reporter This is an important issue, we can take some time to determine a solution.
-
reporter - changed title to Can't create a given Seam Allowance width with Bias options unless seam is vertical or horizontal
-
repo owner Issue
#459was marked as a duplicate of this issue. -
I think, a possible soltion can be to adgere offset to a line instead of an edge. This way, there is only one possible direction of offset at any time. What is given up (beeing able to have inclined seam allowance) is bearable. Transitions would be sharp.
-
reporter - edited description
- changed title to Improve feature: Seam Allowance 'Bias' options useful only when seam is vertical or horizontal
-
reporter - changed component to Detail mode
-
reporter This issue is very important, I'm not sure that this approach can handle the majority of ways to define a seam allowance. What is needed in most cases is issue
#88Where the seam allowance from, for example, A to A1 is 1cm, A1 to A2 is 0 cm, Spl_A2_A3 is 2cm, A3 to A is 5cmThe user could apply a bias to a seam allowance after the basic width of each segment has been defined.
-
repo owner - changed status to duplicate
Duplicate of
#88. -
repo owner - changed status to new
-
repo owner Issue
#578was marked as a duplicate of this issue. -
repo owner - changed status to duplicate
Duplicate of
#88. - Log in to comment