Fact++ 1.6.0 Protege plugin infers all instances to use all object properties
Issue #51
resolved
Original [issue 51](https://code.google.com/p/factplusplus/issues/detail?id=51) created by dtsarkov on 2012-09-20T19:59:30.000Z:
<b>What steps will reproduce the problem?</b> 1. Use Fact++ 1.6.0 and either Protege 4.2_alpha or 4.2_beta 2. Create new ontology. 3. Create new object property "has". 4. Create new individual "me". "me" does not have an explict assertion of "has". 5. Run Fact++. 6. "me" is now inferred to "has 'me'" (the object of the "has" is itself). 7. Such an inference exists for any object property that exists.
<b>What is the expected output? What do you see instead?</b> The expected output is that "me" has no inferred object property assertions. Rather, every individual inferred to have an object property assertion for seemingly every object property.
<b>What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?</b> Windows 7 (64 bit). Fact++ 1.6.0 via both Protege 4.2_alpha (build 256) and Protege 4.2_beta (build 278).
<b>Please provide any additional information below.</b> This seems to have been introduced with 1.6.0 (1.5.3 did not do this). I have also had others confirm using the same applications (although I don't know their OS).
Comments (4)
-
reporter
-
reporter
Comment [
#2](https://code.google.com/p/factplusplus/issues/detail?id=51#c2) originally posted by dtsarkov on 2012-09-24T16:39:27.000Z:Hi Dmitry,
Do you have any ideas yet on whether there is a straight-forward solution to this problem? I'm curious whether a new release might be coming soon. Thanks.
Matt
-
reporter
Comment [
#3](https://code.google.com/p/factplusplus/issues/detail?id=51#c3) originally posted by dtsarkov on 2012-09-25T13:04:58.000Z:Hi Matt,
I figured out where the problem is and now thinking on a best way to fix it. I'll close this bug report when the fix will be in.
I will make a release but not before mid-October: I have absolutely no time at the moment.
Best, Dmitry.
-
reporter
Comment [
#4](https://code.google.com/p/factplusplus/issues/detail?id=51#c4) originally posted by dtsarkov on 2012-10-05T07:19:24.000Z:Fixed in revision 1430
- Log in to comment
Comment [
#1](https://code.google.com/p/factplusplus/issues/detail?id=51#c1) originally posted by dtsarkov on 2012-09-20T20:25:09.000Z:Confirmed. Thanks for the report.