- changed status to resolved
oawk should go ... go ... go ...
Issue #13
resolved
Yes, there could be someone still using this ancient steaming pile. But mostly the old awk is a barrier to adoption. It would be better to be compliant with newer standards by default.
One possible difference; nawk is reputed to be CSI safe, whereas XPG4 awk isn't. Anyway, we have 2 too many awk implementations. Elimination of the eldest is a step in the right direction.
Comments (1)
-
reporter - Log in to comment
fixes
#13oawk should go ... go ... go ...→ <<cset 98285e7d82bf>>