Why there have repeat seqid and 0 in template column of frag_raw file?
ACTGGCTGCGCCGCAGCGGCAGCAGTTTGTTGATTGGCTAAAGGGAAACACGACCGGCAACCACCGCATCCGCGCGGCGGTGCCGGCAGACTGGGCAGTCGGAGACAAAACCGGAACCTGCGGAGTGTATGGCACGGCAAATGACTATGCCGTCGTCTGGCCCACTGGGCGCGCACCTATTGTGTTGGCCGCCTACACCCGGGCGC 12 203 24,24,24,24,24,24,24,24,24,24,24,24 230,230,230,230,230,230,230,230,230,230,230,230 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,37,29,37
like this,the template column have two 29,37; the start and end position are consistent.
Is this right?
Comments (7)
-
-
reporter - attached for_kma_result.zip
<div class="preview-container wiki-content"><!-- loaded via ajax --></div> <div class="mask"></div> </div>
</div> </form>
-
reporter Thank you for reply.
- I use the KPC family ARO sequence from CARD database,use primers to abstract the target seq, then make a KMA database.
- In the reads.fa, this read: repeat_align, have the repeat result 29,37,29,37
- I have another question, the read: uniq_to_KPC_76; I think this read should also belongs to KPC-2. I used blastn checked this read. Am I right?
The KMA version I use: KMA-1.4.7
The command line is in the kma.sh file.
Thank you.
-
reporter
-
- changed status to resolved
Fixed Issue
#74→ <<cset beac9fac1771>>
-
Hi Li
I have looked into the issue, and indeed there was an error in the frag_raw file. This has only affected the output itself in the frag_raw file, while the remaining part of the code has been unaffected. This has been resolved in version 1.4.11.
Regarding 3., there is a nucleotide difference (C->A) between KPC-2 and -76, causing KPC-76 to get a higher score. You can include nearby matches with the “-proxi” option. Where “-proxi 0.99” will include all template matches with a score within 99% of the best match and count them as equals, “-proxi -0.99“ will do the same except the original scores will be used in the ConClave scheme.
Best,
Philip -
reporter Thank you. Regarding 3. , the nucleotide difference (C->A) is between reads and KPC-2, 76. There is a indel between KPC-2 and KPC-76.
- Log in to comment
Hi Li
It depends a bit on the version (can be checked with: kma -v) and options used when running kma.
Is it a public database, or can I get you to send that too. Then I will try to recreate and possibly solve the issue.
Best,
Philip