- changed status to resolved
(rfc pem) does not confirm RFC 1421 section 4.4
Issue #178
resolved
The following PEM message should be valid:
-----BEGIN FOO-----
foo content
-----BEGIN BAR-----
bar content
-----END BAR-----
The following is the specification
The post-EB is either (1) another pre-EB indicating that another encapsulated PEM message follows, or (2) the string "-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----" indicating that any text that immediately follows is non-PEM text.
Comments (1)
-
reporter - Log in to comment
Handling pre-EB as boundary (Fixes
#178)→ <<cset cfe8e3325abf>>