Allow to pass null as value of message call

Issue #157 resolved
Matthias Schoettle created an issue

Currently, when calling a message and specifying the actual values for the parameters, existing structural features or literals can be specified. However, in some cases it might be necessary to pass null. Support for this should be added (probably in form of an OpaqueExpression.

Comments (4)

  1. Matthias Schoettle reporter

    One way could be to introduce a LiteralNull (as a subclass of ValueSpecification) to define a null value. This is how it is done in the UML metamodel.

  2. Log in to comment