Core: Missing "sub" in examples of aggregated and distributed claims

Issue #1018 resolved
Vladimir Dzhuvinov created an issue

The mandatory "sub" is left out from the two examples:

Comments (3)

  1. Daniel Fett

    Sorry to dig up this old issue; but where is it written that “sub” is mandatory in aggregated and distributed claims?

    I only see this text:

    The JWT SHOULD NOT contain a sub (subject) Claim unless its value is an identifier for the End-User at the Claims Provider (and not for the OpenID Provider or another party); this typically means that a sub Claim SHOULD NOT be provided.

  2. Log in to comment