Feedback on OIDC4IDA draft from Dima - part 2
Issue #1409
resolved
Requirements:
- paragraph 5 - check how to reference “this specification” correctly - see FAPI WG Issue #679
Verified claims:
- change heading “5.2. verified_claims delivery“ to “5.2. Verified claims delivery“
- remove “OPs can deliver
verified_claims
in various ways.“ - update 2nd paragraph to “A
verified_claims
element can be added to an OpenID Connect UserInfo response and/or an ID Token.“ - remove “OAuth authorization servers can add
verified_claims
to access tokens in JWT format or token introspection responses, either in plain JSON or JWT-protected format.“ - update paragraph before example to: “Here is an example of the payload of an ID Token including verified claims:“
Comments (7)
-
-
reporter - changed status to open
-
reporter -
todo: raise issue for UserInfo to match casing OIDC Core spec -
PR#214
-
reporter -
reporter - changed status to resolved
Resolved by PR #214
- Log in to comment
Requirements:
Verified claims:
verified_claims
in various ways.“verified_claims
element can be added to an OpenID Connect UserInfo response and/or an ID Token.“ agree with the change; just to note--we have a mix of ‘UserInfo’ and ‘Userinfo’ sprinkled throughout ida now; should settle on one consistent styleverified_claims
to access tokens in JWT format or token introspection responses, either in plain JSON or JWT-protected format.“