1. OpenID Foundation Avatar OpenID Foundation
  2. WGs
  3. fapi

Issues

Filter by:

Advanced search

Issues (626–650 of 686)

Title T P Status Votes Assignee Milestone Created Updated Actions
#108: update Mutual TLS reference in Part 1
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#105: RFC6736 incorrectly referenced in Foreword
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#106: the s in s_hash is for state not code
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug minor resolved
#96: Uncertainty around the resource server's handling of the access token
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#98: Move note regarding URN from 7.3 to 7.1
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#91: Id mix up attack
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#92: Put cipher suite recommendations in the security considerations
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#99: Part 2: TLS considerations section may be ambiguous
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#97: "alg" MUST not be "none"
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#88: Sender constraining the code
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major invalid
#89: s_hash needs to be defined more precisely
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major invalid
#93: Not clear why AS needs to support signed+encrypted ID Token
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#84: RFC2616 is obsolete and references to it should be replaced with updated RFCs
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#75: Support other method of HoK than TOKB
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#85: Make the bullets in the provisions numbered
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#79: Part 1: issues with x-fapi-customer-last-logged-time header
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#73: Spec says Authorization Server shall support both public and confidential clients;
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#76: meaning of 'can'?
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug minor resolved
#71: (ed) The heading level of 6.2.3 is wrong
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug minor resolved
#63: There is no qualification on x-fapi-customer-id
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#70: "User-agents" in 5.2.3 confusing.
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#68: Privacy consideration should be talking about more specifics
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#66: CustomerId == sub == x-fapi-customer-id: Should standardize as sub
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#69: Notes like this are strange “NOTE: Providing access to Javascript clients or not has different security properites.;”
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#64: "non monotonically increasing" does not cover all cases
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. …
  5. 23
  6. 24
  7. 25
  8. 26
  9. 27
  10. 28