1. OpenID Foundation Avatar OpenID Foundation
  2. WGs
  3. fapi

Issues

Filter by:

Advanced search

Issues (1–25 of 54)

Title T P Status Votes Assignee Milestone Created Updated Actions
#638: Add some more text to Introduction
FAPI2: Security Profile
bug major resolved
#565: Add privacy consideration
FAPI2: Message Signing
task major open
#636: Remove unnecessary normative references
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#628: Send acceptance of the report by U Stuttgart for WP2
task major resolved
#600: Errata to remove "Financial-grade" references from FAPI1
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#601: Title 8.1 is redundant
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#153: Add level of assurance to scope
Implementation & Deployment Advice
bug major open
#104: User friendly names and registration of providers
Others
proposal major resolved
#232: Part 1: Complete the privacy consideration section
FAPI 1: Baseline
task major duplicate
#313: (ed) 8.8 has "MUST" and "MUST NOT"
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#207: RS256 vs PS256 (again)
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#160: FAPI part 2 - Request Object Endpoint (client authentication)
Pushed Request Uri
proposal major resolved
#149: Make it clear that the entire flow is OIDC Hybrid Flow (related to #155)
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#152: request objects should have iat and exp
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#157: FAPI part 2 - public clients and mTLS
FAPI 1: Advanced
enhancement major resolved
#150: Mandate at_hash check in the ID Token from the token endpoint
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#21: Residual Data clause should be generalized and moved to privacy considerations
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#38: Part 1 -- write acknowledgement
Part 4: Protected Resources - RO
bug major closed
#109: is s_hash necessary?
FAPI 1: Advanced
proposal major closed
#96: Uncertainty around the resource server's handling of the access token
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#75: Support other method of HoK than TOKB
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#85: Make the bullets in the provisions numbered
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#63: There is no qualification on x-fapi-customer-id
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#68: Privacy consideration should be talking about more specifics
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#66: CustomerId == sub == x-fapi-customer-id: Should standardize as sub
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3