CIBA: How about backchannel_notification_token?

[Takahiko Kawasaki]

If the name of the client_notification_endpoint metadata is changed to backchannel_notification_endpoint (#115), it will be better to change the name of the client_notification_token request parameter to backchannel_notification_token, too.

[Brian Campbell]

IMHO client_notification_token is a better and more meaningful name. And has been that for quite a while now. So I don't think there's good reason to change it, even if #115 results in change to the metadata name.

[Dave Tonge]

I agree with Brian on this

[Brian Campbell]

Discussed during the Nov 13 MODRNA WG call and the general consensus of the WG was also not to change from the current name of client_notification_token

[Brian Campbell]

general consensus of the WG was to make no change