Add some other plots of mean DLP or CTDIvol over time?
Would some other plots of mean DLP over time be useful? Perhaps requested procedure DLP over time and also acquisition DLP over time.
I also think that acquisition CTDIvol over time may be useful too.
@edmcdonagh, what do you think? Am a getting a bit carried away with the charts? Is there anything that you'd like charts of?
Comments (15)
-
-
reporter Also add a plot of CTDI per study description. This will be handy for me for a CT simulator, where there is only study description and not requested procedure or acquisition protocol. Will need to exclude constant angle acquisitions from the data.
-
reporter Added CT chart of CTDIvol per study description. References issue
#233→ <<cset b1d3249a6107>>
-
reporter This doesn't seem to respect the acquisition protocol filter at the moment.
-
reporter Fixed problem of chart not respecting acquisition protocol filter. References issue
#233→ <<cset d47a9d9a738c>>
-
@dplatten - is this required forref
#233?→ <<cset 185cfb971e44>>
-
Hi @dplatten - should this have been marked as closed in one release or another?
-
reporter I was going to add some more "over-time" plots, such as "Requested procedure DLP over time", but haven't done so yet.
-
OK
-
Just came across this action @David Platten - I think it should probably be closed as complete now?
-
reporter Commit
#08afefa
references this issue -
reporter - changed status to resolved
This has been addressed as part of issue
#477. -
Do you want to add this to changes in your 830 branch?
-
reporter - changed milestone to 1.0.0
-
reporter Adding issue
#233to the changes file for this branch. Refs issue#477and issue#233→ <<cset 90fae18464cc>>
- Log in to comment
Go for your life @dplatten! Whatever pleases you, as long as it doesn't get too complicated in the interface. I have to say they are quite powerful, even without size data.
What charts would I like? Mammo, but what I would really like is dose metrics plotted against WED or patient mass (or thickness for mammo). I know it takes too long to compute, but I have two ideas for that:
But... as you don't have weight and we haven't added WED calculations yet... it'll have to wait :-(