Add standard name feature to nuclear medicine modality

[David Platten]

The standard name mapping feature is not currently available for nuclear medicine.

[Ed McDonagh]

Which release do you think this needs to target? It will complicate the messaging slightly.

@Kevin Schärer - have you not hit this already with hanging all the v1.2 stuff off standard name mappings?

[Kevin Schärer]

@Ed McDonagh - No, I have not added the NM modality yet.

[Kevin Schärer]

Adds standard name feature to NM modality

(Refs #979)

→ <<cset 151d853c3501>>

[Kevin Schärer]

@Ed McDonagh ; @David Platten - There is no acquisition protocol for the NM modality, isn’t it? I've discussed with one of our internal physicists what makes the most sense for mapping to a standard name. We concluded that it makes the most sense to identify studies by their study description AND the radiopharmaceutical used for mapping to a standard name. The reasoning behind this is that the study description alone may be the same across multiple radiopharmaceuticals. What do you think of this suggestion?

[Kevin Schärer]

Adds standard names to newly imported NM studies

(Refs #979)

→ <<cset 65507178f92e>>

[Ed McDonagh]

Sorry I never replied to this @Kevin Schärer - I think what you say makes sense from my limited experience of the field!

[Kevin Schärer]

Resolves issue when creating new NM standard name

(Refs #979)

→ <<cset b249ce411e97>>

[Kevin Schärer]

Implements functions to add and update standard names

(Refs #979)

→ <<cset 115af00a8d80>>