385ca8b·Author: Ed McDonagh·Closed by: Ed McDonagh·2019-04-25
Description
Â
This has been a nightmare to get the tests passing on Bitbucket!
@David Platten Would you be able to have a look at this? I'm particularly interested in whether there are any interactions between how the filtering by acquisition type interacts with the new filters, and also whether there are any chart launched filters at event level that might be broken due to the fact that I had to create a new queryset for each of the new filters based on the list of StudyInstanceUID to get the pipeline tests to pass…
Also, I need to align the nomenclature - you have used Scan Projection Radiographs, I would prefer Topograms unless that is vendor specific?
Anyone else who cares to review, test and comment - your contributions would be very welcome!
Once tested and decisions made on nomenclature, will need to update the docs.
Â
This has been a nightmare to get the tests passing on Bitbucket!
@David Platten Would you be able to have a look at this? I'm particularly interested in whether there are any interactions between how the filtering by acquisition type interacts with the new filters, and also whether there are any chart launched filters at event level that might be broken due to the fact that I had to create a new queryset for each of the new filters based on the list of
StudyInstanceUIDto get the pipeline tests to pass…Also, I need to align the nomenclature - you have used Scan Projection Radiographs, I would prefer Topograms unless that is vendor specific?
Anyone else who cares to review, test and comment - your contributions would be very welcome!
Once tested and decisions made on nomenclature, will need to update the docs.