It should be possible to constrain which intervals match in an exclusive rule
Issue #14
resolved
Right now it seems that you cannot refer to the excluded interval in the expressions of an exclusive rule, but you should be able to constrain which intervals are excluded using the where clause. Obviously, you should not be able to refer to the excluded rule in the map or end points expressions.
Comments (4)
-
reporter
-
reporter
Confusingly, although I reported this, I cannot reproduce it.
-
reporter
- changed status to invalid
As mentioned I can't reproduce this, and the calls are all there to be able to support it. I think it works. I added a functional test that demonstrates it.
-
reporter
- changed status to resolved
Remove reference to fixed bug
#14.→ <<cset ba21a2f5f37a>>
- Log in to comment
There is a workaround for this issue, which is to create an atomic rule for the excluded interval which contains manual constraints, and then to exclude that interval instead. Still, it should be fixed.