1. OpenID Foundation Avatar OpenID Foundation
  2. WGs
  3. fapi

Issues

Filter by:

Advanced search

Issues (451–475 of 515)

Title T P Status Votes Assignee Milestone Created Updated Actions
#18: "Authorization token" is not a defined term in RFC6749
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#14: Allowed Redirection Client URI is not a defined term
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#126: Update OAUTH-MTLS reference
FAPI 1: Advanced
enhancement trivial resolved
#125: Create a FAPI WG response to the Berlin Group Consultation
FAPI 1: Advanced
task major resolved
#112: Inconsistency around encrypted ID Tokens
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#113: awkward logic around client support for OAUTB or MTLS
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug minor resolved
#111: MTLS only for Protected resources provisions?
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#108: update Mutual TLS reference in Part 1
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#107: Content-type header in HTTP response from resource server
FAPI 1: Baseline
proposal minor resolved
#105: RFC6736 incorrectly referenced in Foreword
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#106: the s in s_hash is for state not code
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug minor resolved
#96: Uncertainty around the resource server's handling of the access token
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#98: Move note regarding URN from 7.3 to 7.1
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#91: Id mix up attack
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#97: "alg" MUST not be "none"
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#93: Not clear why AS needs to support signed+encrypted ID Token
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#74: Write spec should only support confidential clients
FAPI 1: Advanced
proposal major resolved
#83: Support for GET
FAPI 1: Baseline
enhancement trivial resolved
#85: Make the bullets in the provisions numbered
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#76: meaning of 'can'?
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug minor resolved
#71: (ed) The heading level of 6.2.3 is wrong
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug minor resolved
#70: "User-agents" in 5.2.3 confusing.
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#68: Privacy consideration should be talking about more specifics
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#66: CustomerId == sub == x-fapi-customer-id: Should standardize as sub
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
#64: "non monotonically increasing" does not cover all cases
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major resolved
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. …
  5. 16
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. 20
  10. 21