1. OpenID Foundation Avatar OpenID Foundation
  2. WGs
  3. fapi

Issues

Filter by:

Advanced search

Issues (551–575 of 712)

Title T P Status Votes Assignee Milestone Created Updated Actions
#174: CIBA: End-user Identifiers
CIBA
proposal major closed
#235: (te) 5.2.2 Add a note explaining why this profile mandates "shall not support CIBA push mode;"
CIBA
enhancement minor closed
#230: Call out that client notification endpoint bearer token is not MTLS certificate bound
CIBA
bug major closed
#228: CIBA and Lodging Intent
CIBA
bug major closed
#231: (ed) CIBA: 7.4 Title states "Fruad"
CIBA
bug trivial resolved
#234: (ed) JARM should be added in the introduction
CIBA
proposal trivial resolved
#116: CIBA - authentication methods and proof of possession
CIBA
task minor resolved
#120: CIBA: x-fapi-device-id header
CIBA
proposal minor resolved
#117: CIBA - Signature for succesful token notification
CIBA
bug minor resolved
#183: Poor section title: 5.2.2.1 returning authenticated user's identifier Authorization server
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug trivial resolved
#179: Resources served by a Resource Server may not necessarily be UTF-8 encoded
FAPI 1: Baseline
proposal minor resolved
#171: R+W Public Client Support for RW should be a MAY not a SHOULD
FAPI 1: Advanced
enhancement major resolved
#167: (ed) 5.2.3 - Last Para should be a numbered bullet
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#149: Make it clear that the entire flow is OIDC Hybrid Flow (related to #155)
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#148: IANA Considerations : Disovery, Grant Types, dynamic reg
CIBA
enhancement major resolved
#221: FAPI-RW ID2 needs some further tweaks for JARM
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#209: Ciphers
FAPI 1: Advanced
enhancement major resolved
#172: Add Guidance for the use of FAPI for payments
FAPI 1: Advanced
proposal major resolved
#140: New name for FAPI
Others
task major resolved
#214: restricting 'aud' in request object to a single value
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#190: aud should be mandatory in requests objects
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#211: clients should be required to send a 'reasonable' exp in request object
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#213: requirements on RSA/EC key sizes should apply to more situations
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#189: behaviour of AS when client passes different values in request object vs OAuth 2.0 request syntax
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#217: "shall additionally send duplicates of the parameters/values using the OAuth 2.0 request syntax where required by the OAuth specification" is vague
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. …
  5. 21
  6. 22
  7. 23
  8. 24
  9. 25
  10. 26
  11. 27
  12. 28
  13. 29