1. OpenID Foundation Avatar OpenID Foundation
  2. WGs
  3. fapi

Issues

Filter by:

Advanced search

Issues (51–75 of 80)

Title T P Status Votes Assignee Milestone Created Updated Actions
#154: Behaviour of AS undefined if no acr claim supplied by client
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#272: FAPI-CIBA mentions 'FAPI lodging intent' doc but links only to pushed request object
CIBA
bug major closed
#263: Are scopes required to be returned when exchanging Refresh Tokens for Access Tokens.
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#259: Change name of Deployment doc
Others
enhancement major closed
#86: The read only spec should not contain 'if possible' in section 5.2.2
FAPI 1: Baseline
enhancement major closed
#218: LoA3 requirement in part2 may be too much
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#246: FAPI-CIBA doesn't explicitly import FAPI-RW cipher limitations
CIBA
bug major closed
#187: Part 1 client requirements for state/nonce aren't reflected as authorization server requirements
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#177: request object should contain iat or nbf
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#225: Remove references to OAuth Token Binding
FAPI 1: Advanced
proposal major closed
#127: CIBA: security issues
CIBA
enhancement major closed
#208: Part 2 should limit allowed JWE algorithms
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed 1
#233: (ed) CIBA: Move RFC6749, RFC6750, OIDC to Bibligraphy. Add RFC7636 to Bibliography
CIBA
bug trivial closed
#235: (te) 5.2.2 Add a note explaining why this profile mandates "shall not support CIBA push mode;"
CIBA
enhancement minor closed
#230: Call out that client notification endpoint bearer token is not MTLS certificate bound
CIBA
bug major closed
#231: (ed) CIBA: 7.4 Title states "Fruad"
CIBA
bug trivial resolved
#221: FAPI-RW ID2 needs some further tweaks for JARM
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#214: restricting 'aud' in request object to a single value
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#211: clients should be required to send a 'reasonable' exp in request object
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#213: requirements on RSA/EC key sizes should apply to more situations
FAPI 1: Baseline
bug major closed
#189: behaviour of AS when client passes different values in request object vs OAuth 2.0 request syntax
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#178: Editorial: Specs should explain the risks of writing an RP library from scratch
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
#144: Apply the new name to the Part 1 and 2
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug blocker resolved
#162: does part 2 allow client_secret_jwt?
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major resolved
#141: Remove x-fapi-financial-id
FAPI 1: Advanced
bug major closed
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4